Testing Spatial Data Deliverance in SQL and NoSQL Database Using NodeJS Fullstack Web App

Dany Laksono
{"title":"Testing Spatial Data Deliverance in SQL and NoSQL Database Using NodeJS Fullstack Web App","authors":"Dany Laksono","doi":"10.1109/ICSTC.2018.8528705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the last decade, we saw an explosion of geospatial data being produced. Most of which coming from GPS-enabled devices available for general consumers. The large amount of geotagged data coined the term ‘Geospatial Big Data’, indicating the semi-structured and unstructured nature of such data. SQL relational databases have been known in the past to handle geospatial data very well. However, the abundance of geospatial big data pushed forward the need for NoSQL database which is expected to perform better in terms of handling and storing geospatial big data. This paper discusses the quantitative comparison of performance between the SQL (i.e., PostGIS) and NoSQL (i.e., MongoDB) databases in handling geospatial big data. A NodeJS-based angular-framework web app was developed to test the real-world performance of MongoDB and PostGIS in handling a large amount of simulated geospatial data. A different number of points were generated for testing the geospatial data storing and loading capability of both the databases. The test was conducted by comparing the result of XHR (XML HTTP Request) of both databases in each case. The result showed that NoSQL database, i.e. MongoDB, performs better in loading big geospatial data compared to traditional SQL database using PostGIS.","PeriodicalId":196768,"journal":{"name":"2018 4th International Conference on Science and Technology (ICST)","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 4th International Conference on Science and Technology (ICST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSTC.2018.8528705","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

During the last decade, we saw an explosion of geospatial data being produced. Most of which coming from GPS-enabled devices available for general consumers. The large amount of geotagged data coined the term ‘Geospatial Big Data’, indicating the semi-structured and unstructured nature of such data. SQL relational databases have been known in the past to handle geospatial data very well. However, the abundance of geospatial big data pushed forward the need for NoSQL database which is expected to perform better in terms of handling and storing geospatial big data. This paper discusses the quantitative comparison of performance between the SQL (i.e., PostGIS) and NoSQL (i.e., MongoDB) databases in handling geospatial big data. A NodeJS-based angular-framework web app was developed to test the real-world performance of MongoDB and PostGIS in handling a large amount of simulated geospatial data. A different number of points were generated for testing the geospatial data storing and loading capability of both the databases. The test was conducted by comparing the result of XHR (XML HTTP Request) of both databases in each case. The result showed that NoSQL database, i.e. MongoDB, performs better in loading big geospatial data compared to traditional SQL database using PostGIS.
使用NodeJS全栈Web应用测试SQL和NoSQL数据库中的空间数据传输
在过去的十年里,我们看到了地理空间数据的爆炸式增长。其中大部分来自普通消费者可用的具有gps功能的设备。大量的地理标记数据创造了“地理空间大数据”这个术语,表明这些数据的半结构化和非结构化性质。SQL关系数据库在过去被认为可以很好地处理地理空间数据。然而,丰富的地理空间大数据推动了对NoSQL数据库的需求,NoSQL数据库有望在处理和存储地理空间大数据方面表现更好。本文讨论了SQL(即PostGIS)和NoSQL(即MongoDB)数据库在处理地理空间大数据方面的性能的定量比较。开发了一个基于nodejs的angular框架web应用程序,以测试MongoDB和PostGIS在处理大量模拟地理空间数据方面的实际性能。为了测试两个数据库的地理空间数据存储和加载能力,生成了不同数量的点。测试是通过比较两个数据库在每种情况下的XHR (XML HTTP Request)结果来进行的。结果表明,使用PostGIS加载大型地理空间数据时,NoSQL数据库即MongoDB的性能优于传统SQL数据库。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信