From Centralized Management of Robot Swarms to Decentralized Scheduling

Daniel Graff, R. Karnapke
{"title":"From Centralized Management of Robot Swarms to Decentralized Scheduling","authors":"Daniel Graff, R. Karnapke","doi":"10.1109/IOTAIS.2018.8600917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Future IoT systems might be comprised of hundreds or even thousands of nodes. Managing all of these nodes should be done automatically, as individual programming is tedious and error prone. For this reason, we introduced the swarm scheduler in previous work. It receives a specification of the job to be done, and schedules it on the best candidate robot. While this scheduler works fine for a limited number of nodes, it is based on a centralized approach and will not scale well when the number of nodes reaches hundreds or even thousands. In this paper we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the centralized approach and present two different decentralized versions we are currently investigating as well as some preliminary results.","PeriodicalId":302621,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE International Conference on Internet of Things and Intelligence System (IOTAIS)","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE International Conference on Internet of Things and Intelligence System (IOTAIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IOTAIS.2018.8600917","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Future IoT systems might be comprised of hundreds or even thousands of nodes. Managing all of these nodes should be done automatically, as individual programming is tedious and error prone. For this reason, we introduced the swarm scheduler in previous work. It receives a specification of the job to be done, and schedules it on the best candidate robot. While this scheduler works fine for a limited number of nodes, it is based on a centralized approach and will not scale well when the number of nodes reaches hundreds or even thousands. In this paper we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the centralized approach and present two different decentralized versions we are currently investigating as well as some preliminary results.
从机器人群集中管理到分散调度
未来的物联网系统可能由数百甚至数千个节点组成。所有这些节点的管理都应该自动完成,因为单独的编程既繁琐又容易出错。出于这个原因,我们在前面的工作中介绍了群调度程序。它接收要完成的工作的说明,并将其安排在最佳候选机器人上。虽然这个调度器在有限数量的节点上工作得很好,但它基于集中式方法,当节点数量达到数百甚至数千时,它将无法很好地扩展。在本文中,我们讨论了中心化方法的优点和缺点,并提出了我们目前正在研究的两种不同的去中心化版本以及一些初步结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信