Qualitative Evaluation of Face Embeddings Extracted From well-known Face Recognition Models

Rassul Tolegenov, K. Bostanbekov, D. Nurseitov, Kuanysh Slyamkhan
{"title":"Qualitative Evaluation of Face Embeddings Extracted From well-known Face Recognition Models","authors":"Rassul Tolegenov, K. Bostanbekov, D. Nurseitov, Kuanysh Slyamkhan","doi":"10.1109/SIST50301.2021.9465952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper demonstrates a qualitative evaluation/comparison of face embeddings extracted from deep learning models, such as VGG-Face, Dlib, and OpenFace, on a face discrimination task. While conducting experiments, each of linear SVM (support vector machine) classifier, Euclidean distance, and Cosine distance algorithms was utilized to compare/analyze face vectors (embeddings) extracted from those 3 deep learning models. This resulted in 9 overall combinations of face recognition techniques to be compared. To implement a fair comparison of these 9 combinations, first, training and test datasets were gathered; these datasets were made up of complete frontal and well-cropped (NxN sized) face images of 33 persons (mostly Asian), with at least 10 different face images for each person. Then, face images in the training dataset were introduced into deep learning models to extract face vectors from them. Next, these face vectors were stored in a local directory as a reference database (to be used with Euclidean and Cosine distance methods) and were used to train SVM classifier. Subsequently, these face vectors were utilized to classify (recognize) face images (vectors) from the test dataset. As experiments proved, the best face recognition technique amongst 9 combinations was Dlib based face recognition model (with SVM classifier combined) as it showed the highest rate to distinguish people from each other.Although, this research work does not bring novelty to the domain, it took an effort to evaluate/compare well-known deep face models performances on Asian faces (mostly) and choose the best one to utilize as a basis for door access control application.","PeriodicalId":318915,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE International Conference on Smart Information Systems and Technologies (SIST)","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE International Conference on Smart Information Systems and Technologies (SIST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIST50301.2021.9465952","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper demonstrates a qualitative evaluation/comparison of face embeddings extracted from deep learning models, such as VGG-Face, Dlib, and OpenFace, on a face discrimination task. While conducting experiments, each of linear SVM (support vector machine) classifier, Euclidean distance, and Cosine distance algorithms was utilized to compare/analyze face vectors (embeddings) extracted from those 3 deep learning models. This resulted in 9 overall combinations of face recognition techniques to be compared. To implement a fair comparison of these 9 combinations, first, training and test datasets were gathered; these datasets were made up of complete frontal and well-cropped (NxN sized) face images of 33 persons (mostly Asian), with at least 10 different face images for each person. Then, face images in the training dataset were introduced into deep learning models to extract face vectors from them. Next, these face vectors were stored in a local directory as a reference database (to be used with Euclidean and Cosine distance methods) and were used to train SVM classifier. Subsequently, these face vectors were utilized to classify (recognize) face images (vectors) from the test dataset. As experiments proved, the best face recognition technique amongst 9 combinations was Dlib based face recognition model (with SVM classifier combined) as it showed the highest rate to distinguish people from each other.Although, this research work does not bring novelty to the domain, it took an effort to evaluate/compare well-known deep face models performances on Asian faces (mostly) and choose the best one to utilize as a basis for door access control application.
从知名人脸识别模型中提取的人脸嵌入的定性评价
本文演示了从深度学习模型(如VGG-Face, Dlib和OpenFace)中提取的人脸嵌入在人脸识别任务上的定性评估/比较。在进行实验时,分别使用线性支持向量机(SVM)分类器、欧氏距离算法和余弦距离算法对3种深度学习模型中提取的人脸向量(嵌入)进行比较/分析。这导致了9种面部识别技术的整体组合进行比较。为了对这9种组合进行公平的比较,首先,收集训练和测试数据集;这些数据集由33个人(主要是亚洲人)的完整正面和精心剪裁(NxN大小)的面部图像组成,每个人至少有10个不同的面部图像。然后,将训练数据集中的人脸图像引入深度学习模型,从中提取人脸向量。接下来,将这些人脸向量存储在本地目录中作为参考数据库(将与欧几里得和余弦距离方法一起使用),并用于训练SVM分类器。随后,利用这些人脸向量对测试数据集中的人脸图像(向量)进行分类(识别)。实验证明,在9种组合中,基于Dlib的人脸识别模型(与SVM分类器相结合)的人脸识别技术表现出最高的区分率,是最佳的人脸识别技术。虽然这项研究工作并没有给该领域带来新颖性,但它需要努力评估/比较已知的深人脸模型在亚洲人脸(大多数)上的性能,并选择最好的模型作为门访问控制应用的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信