A model of ecowelfare

T. Fitzpatrick
{"title":"A model of ecowelfare","authors":"T. Fitzpatrick","doi":"10.7765/9781526137241.00013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Post-productivism is therefore opposed to the social dominance of waged work, as this involves neglecting the reproductive value of emotional and ecological labour. As such, productivism has begun to reach the limits of itself because of its increasing inability to reproduce its own conditions. Like a dying star, productivism survives by consuming the waste that it has produced, it absorbs the consequences of too little care and too little sustainability by attempting to convert them into further sources of productivity. But these waste products are no substitutes for a proper ethics of care and sustainability, ethics that guide us beyond the employment society of endless GDP growth and endless productivity, so that this process cannot last indefinitely. Productivism does not necessarily reach a crisis – there is nothing historically inevitable about post-productivism – but it does implode into a cycle where productivist solutions are more and more ephemeral, re-inverting into further social problems at an everaccelerating rate. It is the disease that purports to be the cure. So, over the last couple of chapters I have stressed the importance of care work and sustainability, on the basis that these continue to be underemphasised by social democrats, old as well as new. In addition to distributive justice, these are the philosophical foundations of an ecowelfare politics, of a post-productivist social democracy. We have already addressed the main features of distributive justice in Chapter 2 and so our task here, in the following two sections, is to give an account of care and sustainability. I will then provide a simple model of ecowelfare and explore the main points of creation and tension between its three principal components.","PeriodicalId":352921,"journal":{"name":"After the new social democracy","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"After the new social democracy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526137241.00013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Post-productivism is therefore opposed to the social dominance of waged work, as this involves neglecting the reproductive value of emotional and ecological labour. As such, productivism has begun to reach the limits of itself because of its increasing inability to reproduce its own conditions. Like a dying star, productivism survives by consuming the waste that it has produced, it absorbs the consequences of too little care and too little sustainability by attempting to convert them into further sources of productivity. But these waste products are no substitutes for a proper ethics of care and sustainability, ethics that guide us beyond the employment society of endless GDP growth and endless productivity, so that this process cannot last indefinitely. Productivism does not necessarily reach a crisis – there is nothing historically inevitable about post-productivism – but it does implode into a cycle where productivist solutions are more and more ephemeral, re-inverting into further social problems at an everaccelerating rate. It is the disease that purports to be the cure. So, over the last couple of chapters I have stressed the importance of care work and sustainability, on the basis that these continue to be underemphasised by social democrats, old as well as new. In addition to distributive justice, these are the philosophical foundations of an ecowelfare politics, of a post-productivist social democracy. We have already addressed the main features of distributive justice in Chapter 2 and so our task here, in the following two sections, is to give an account of care and sustainability. I will then provide a simple model of ecowelfare and explore the main points of creation and tension between its three principal components.
生态福利的典范
因此,后生产主义反对有偿工作的社会主导地位,因为这涉及忽视情感和生态劳动的生殖价值。因此,生产主义已经开始达到它自身的极限,因为它越来越无法再生产它自己的条件。就像一颗垂死的星星,生产主义通过消耗它所产生的废物而生存,它通过试图将其转化为进一步的生产力来源来吸收缺乏关怀和缺乏可持续性的后果。但是,这些废物并不能替代适当的关怀和可持续发展伦理,这些伦理将引导我们超越GDP无休止增长和生产率无休止的就业社会,因此,这一过程不会无限期地持续下去。生产主义不一定会陷入危机——从历史上看,后生产主义没有什么不可避免的——但它确实会陷入一个循环,在这个循环中,生产主义的解决方案越来越短暂,并以不断加速的速度重新转化为进一步的社会问题。这是一种声称可以治愈的疾病。因此,在过去的几章中,我强调了护理工作和可持续性的重要性,这是基于社会民主主义者,无论是老的还是新的,都没有充分强调这些。除了分配正义之外,这些都是生态福利政治、后生产主义社会民主主义的哲学基础。我们已经在第2章中讨论了分配正义的主要特征,因此我们在这里的任务,在接下来的两个部分中,是给出一个关于关怀和可持续性的说明。然后,我将提供一个简单的生态福利模型,并探索其三个主要组成部分之间的创造要点和张力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信