Analyzing Test Smells Refactoring from a Developers Perspective

Humberto Damasceno, Carla Bezerra, E. Coutinho, Ivan Machado
{"title":"Analyzing Test Smells Refactoring from a Developers Perspective","authors":"Humberto Damasceno, Carla Bezerra, E. Coutinho, Ivan Machado","doi":"10.1145/3571473.3571487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Test smells represent a set of poorly designed tests, which can harm a test code’s maintenance and quality criteria. Although fundamental steps to understand test smells have been investigated, there is still an evident lack of studies evaluating the impact of test smell refactoring from internal quality attributes, such as size, cohesion, coupling, and complexity. In addition, the literature still lacks research that addresses the difficulties developers encounter during test smell refactoring. The paper investigates the impact of test smell refactoring from developers’ perspectives and internal quality attributes. We investigated the perceptions and difficulties encountered by 20 developers while removing 5 types of test smells in 4 open-source projects over two months. Through this experiment, we analyzed: (i) the impact that test smell refactoring has on internal quality attributes; (ii) developers’ perception of test smells as actual problems within a software system; and (iii) main difficulties encountered by developers during test smell refactoring. Our findings can help developers design a prioritization scheme for test smell refactoring and make them aware of the real benefits of test smell refactoring.","PeriodicalId":440784,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the XXI Brazilian Symposium on Software Quality","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the XXI Brazilian Symposium on Software Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3571473.3571487","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Test smells represent a set of poorly designed tests, which can harm a test code’s maintenance and quality criteria. Although fundamental steps to understand test smells have been investigated, there is still an evident lack of studies evaluating the impact of test smell refactoring from internal quality attributes, such as size, cohesion, coupling, and complexity. In addition, the literature still lacks research that addresses the difficulties developers encounter during test smell refactoring. The paper investigates the impact of test smell refactoring from developers’ perspectives and internal quality attributes. We investigated the perceptions and difficulties encountered by 20 developers while removing 5 types of test smells in 4 open-source projects over two months. Through this experiment, we analyzed: (i) the impact that test smell refactoring has on internal quality attributes; (ii) developers’ perception of test smells as actual problems within a software system; and (iii) main difficulties encountered by developers during test smell refactoring. Our findings can help developers design a prioritization scheme for test smell refactoring and make them aware of the real benefits of test smell refactoring.
从开发人员的角度分析测试气味重构
测试气味代表了一组设计不良的测试,这可能会损害测试代码的维护和质量标准。尽管已经研究了理解测试气味的基本步骤,但仍然明显缺乏从内部质量属性(如大小、内聚、耦合和复杂性)评估测试气味重构影响的研究。此外,文献中仍然缺乏解决开发人员在测试气味重构过程中遇到的困难的研究。本文从开发人员的角度和内部质量属性研究了测试气味重构的影响。我们调查了20名开发人员在两个月内消除4个开源项目中的5种测试气味时遇到的感受和困难。通过本实验,我们分析了:(1)测试气味重构对内部质量属性的影响;(ii)开发人员认为测试气味是软件系统中的实际问题;(iii)开发人员在测试气味重构过程中遇到的主要困难。我们的发现可以帮助开发人员为测试气味重构设计优先级方案,并让他们意识到测试气味重构的真正好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信