What affordances of synchronous text-based chat tools help promote noticing and negotiation of meaning in language learner interactions?

Andrew William
{"title":"What affordances of synchronous text-based chat tools help promote noticing and negotiation of meaning in language learner interactions?","authors":"Andrew William","doi":"10.18327/ijfs.2010.12.3.227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Current research suggests that synchronous text-based chat tools encourage both noticing and negotiation of meaning in language learner interactions, both of which are regarded as important procedures in language learning. This paper seeks to identify what affordances of synchronous text-based chat tools may encourage such language behavior. Using concurrent think-aloud report data from a language learner interaction, it was found that learner perceptions of chat tools as social tools may actually inhibit noticing and meaning negotiation. However, the lack of turn-taking conventions in text chats may serve to encourage modifications of output, while visual adjacency of corrective recasts to error may promote noticing.","PeriodicalId":230296,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Foreign Studies","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Foreign Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18327/ijfs.2010.12.3.227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Current research suggests that synchronous text-based chat tools encourage both noticing and negotiation of meaning in language learner interactions, both of which are regarded as important procedures in language learning. This paper seeks to identify what affordances of synchronous text-based chat tools may encourage such language behavior. Using concurrent think-aloud report data from a language learner interaction, it was found that learner perceptions of chat tools as social tools may actually inhibit noticing and meaning negotiation. However, the lack of turn-taking conventions in text chats may serve to encourage modifications of output, while visual adjacency of corrective recasts to error may promote noticing.
同步文本聊天工具的哪些功能有助于促进语言学习者互动中对意义的注意和协商?
目前的研究表明,同步文本聊天工具在语言学习者的互动中促进了对意义的注意和协商,这两者都被认为是语言学习的重要过程。本文试图确定同步文本聊天工具的哪些功能会鼓励这种语言行为。使用语言学习者互动的并发思考报告数据,发现学习者将聊天工具视为社交工具的看法实际上可能会抑制注意和意义协商。然而,在文本聊天中缺乏轮流的惯例可能会鼓励对输出的修改,而纠正性重铸与错误的视觉邻接可能会促进注意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信