The response of tall buildings to far-field earthquakes and the case of a 49-storey steel building

S. Muin, A. Astaneh-Asl, C. Topkaya
{"title":"The response of tall buildings to far-field earthquakes and the case of a 49-storey steel building","authors":"S. Muin, A. Astaneh-Asl, C. Topkaya","doi":"10.1504/ijeie.2020.10027031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates the seismic response of an instrumented 49-storey steel structure in San Francisco to weak, far-field, and strong, near-field ground motions. The instrumentation records obtained during the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake are used to verify the accuracy of the predictions of the time-history analysis of the model. The ChiChi-002 ground motion record from the 1992 Chi-Chi earthquake in Taiwan (PGA = 0.08 g), representing a 'weak, far-field' earthquake and the record from the 1994 Northridge-Newhall earthquake (PGA = 0.60 g) representing a 'strong, near-field' earthquake were used in the study. The results showed that the force, acceleration, and displacement responses of this long-period structure to the 'weak far-field' ground motion are much larger than its response to the 'strong, near-field' ground motion. Also, the response attenuates at a slower rate for the weak, far-field earthquake, indicating the possibility of greater damage, both to structural and non-structural elements, during the earthquake. Interim seismic design recommendations are formulated to address this issue in the design of tall buildings with long periods.","PeriodicalId":440568,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Earthquake and Impact Engineering","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Earthquake and Impact Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/ijeie.2020.10027031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper investigates the seismic response of an instrumented 49-storey steel structure in San Francisco to weak, far-field, and strong, near-field ground motions. The instrumentation records obtained during the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake are used to verify the accuracy of the predictions of the time-history analysis of the model. The ChiChi-002 ground motion record from the 1992 Chi-Chi earthquake in Taiwan (PGA = 0.08 g), representing a 'weak, far-field' earthquake and the record from the 1994 Northridge-Newhall earthquake (PGA = 0.60 g) representing a 'strong, near-field' earthquake were used in the study. The results showed that the force, acceleration, and displacement responses of this long-period structure to the 'weak far-field' ground motion are much larger than its response to the 'strong, near-field' ground motion. Also, the response attenuates at a slower rate for the weak, far-field earthquake, indicating the possibility of greater damage, both to structural and non-structural elements, during the earthquake. Interim seismic design recommendations are formulated to address this issue in the design of tall buildings with long periods.
高层建筑对远场地震的响应及以49层钢结构建筑为例
本文研究了旧金山一座仪器49层钢结构对弱、远场和强、近场地面运动的地震反应。利用1989年洛马普列塔地震期间的仪器记录来验证模型时程分析预测的准确性。研究中使用了1992年台湾Chi-Chi地震的chi -002地面运动记录(PGA = 0.08 g),代表“弱、远场”地震,1994年Northridge-Newhall地震的记录(PGA = 0.60 g)代表“强、近场”地震。结果表明,这种长周期结构对“弱远场”地面运动的力、加速度和位移响应远远大于对“强、近场”地面运动的响应。此外,对于弱远场地震,响应衰减速度较慢,这表明地震期间对结构和非结构元件的破坏可能更大。为了解决长周期高层建筑设计中的这一问题,制定了临时抗震设计建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信