Marcelo Henrique Otowicz, L. D. Lacerda, L. Emmendoerfer, A. A. Biz
{"title":"Tourism, knowledge management and its processes","authors":"Marcelo Henrique Otowicz, L. D. Lacerda, L. Emmendoerfer, A. A. Biz","doi":"10.7784/rbtur.v16.2368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\n\n\nWhen it comes to knowledge management (KM), one of the ways to classify it is through its processes. When it comes to tourism, it is the sectors that reveal its practical development. At this juncture, this article aims to analyze which are the tourism sectors that are considering KM in their research, as well as which KM processes are most used in tourism studies. To this end, this research is supported by an integrative literature review and follows the guidelines of the PRISMA recommendation. Due to the research protocol established and using the Scopus and Web of Science databases, an initial sample of 376 articles was obtained, of which 107 met the eligibility criteria. The research results are: (1) the most representative sectors are macro tourism and the accommodation services segment; (2) there is an emphasis on knowledge sharing and transfer processes, which are KM concerns also in other areas; (3) the researches highlight tacit knowledge, given its management complexity and the competitive differential it supports; (4) the researches on KM in tourism received criticism for low quality, complexity of scientific language, or disconnection with the managers and operators in the private and public sectors.\n\n\n\n","PeriodicalId":113408,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Turismo","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Turismo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7784/rbtur.v16.2368","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
When it comes to knowledge management (KM), one of the ways to classify it is through its processes. When it comes to tourism, it is the sectors that reveal its practical development. At this juncture, this article aims to analyze which are the tourism sectors that are considering KM in their research, as well as which KM processes are most used in tourism studies. To this end, this research is supported by an integrative literature review and follows the guidelines of the PRISMA recommendation. Due to the research protocol established and using the Scopus and Web of Science databases, an initial sample of 376 articles was obtained, of which 107 met the eligibility criteria. The research results are: (1) the most representative sectors are macro tourism and the accommodation services segment; (2) there is an emphasis on knowledge sharing and transfer processes, which are KM concerns also in other areas; (3) the researches highlight tacit knowledge, given its management complexity and the competitive differential it supports; (4) the researches on KM in tourism received criticism for low quality, complexity of scientific language, or disconnection with the managers and operators in the private and public sectors.
当涉及到知识管理(KM)时,对其进行分类的方法之一是通过其过程。说到旅游业,它是揭示其实际发展的部门。在此,本文旨在分析哪些旅游部门在其研究中考虑了知识管理,以及哪些知识管理过程在旅游研究中使用最多。为此,本研究得到综合文献综述的支持,并遵循PRISMA推荐的指导方针。根据建立的研究方案并使用Scopus和Web of Science数据库,获得了376篇文章的初始样本,其中107篇符合入选标准。研究结果表明:(1)最具代表性的行业是宏观旅游业和住宿服务业;(2)强调知识共享和转移过程,这也是其他领域KM关注的问题;(3)鉴于隐性知识管理的复杂性和它所支持的竞争差异,研究重点是隐性知识;(4)旅游领域知识管理研究存在质量低、科学语言复杂、与公私部门管理者和经营者脱节等问题。