A performance comparison of the transform domain Rayleigh quotient quadratic correlation filter (TDRQQCF) approach to the regularized RQQCF

P. Ragothaman, Abhijit Mahalanobis, R. Muise, W. Mikhael
{"title":"A performance comparison of the transform domain Rayleigh quotient quadratic correlation filter (TDRQQCF) approach to the regularized RQQCF","authors":"P. Ragothaman, Abhijit Mahalanobis, R. Muise, W. Mikhael","doi":"10.1117/12.784055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Rayleigh Quotient Quadratic Correlation Filter (RQQCF) has been used to achieve very good performance for Automatic Target Detection/Recognition. The filter coefficients are obtained as the solution that maximizes a class separation metric, thus resulting in optimal performance. Recently, a transform domain approach was presented for ATR using the RQQCF called the Transform Domain RQQCF (TDRQQCF). The TDRQQCF considerably reduced the computational complexity and storage requirements, by compressing the target and clutter data used in designing the QCF. In addition, the TDRQQCF approach was able to produce larger responses when the filter was correlated with target and clutter images. This was achieved while maintaining the excellent recognition accuracy of the original spatial domain RQQCF algorithm. The computation of the RQQCF and the TDRQQCF involve the inverse of the term A1 = Rx + Ry where Rx and Ry are the sample autocorrelation matrices for targets and clutter respectively. It can be conjectured that the TDRQQCF approach is equivalent to regularizing A1. A common regularization approach involves performing the Eigenvalue Decomposition (EVD) of A1, setting some small eigenvalues to zero, and then reconstructing A1, which is now expected to be better conditioned. In this paper, this regularization approach is investigated, and compared to the TDRQQCF.","PeriodicalId":133868,"journal":{"name":"SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing","volume":"6967 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.784055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The Rayleigh Quotient Quadratic Correlation Filter (RQQCF) has been used to achieve very good performance for Automatic Target Detection/Recognition. The filter coefficients are obtained as the solution that maximizes a class separation metric, thus resulting in optimal performance. Recently, a transform domain approach was presented for ATR using the RQQCF called the Transform Domain RQQCF (TDRQQCF). The TDRQQCF considerably reduced the computational complexity and storage requirements, by compressing the target and clutter data used in designing the QCF. In addition, the TDRQQCF approach was able to produce larger responses when the filter was correlated with target and clutter images. This was achieved while maintaining the excellent recognition accuracy of the original spatial domain RQQCF algorithm. The computation of the RQQCF and the TDRQQCF involve the inverse of the term A1 = Rx + Ry where Rx and Ry are the sample autocorrelation matrices for targets and clutter respectively. It can be conjectured that the TDRQQCF approach is equivalent to regularizing A1. A common regularization approach involves performing the Eigenvalue Decomposition (EVD) of A1, setting some small eigenvalues to zero, and then reconstructing A1, which is now expected to be better conditioned. In this paper, this regularization approach is investigated, and compared to the TDRQQCF.
将变换域瑞利商二次相关滤波器(TDRQQCF)与正则化RQQCF进行性能比较
瑞利商二次相关滤波器(RQQCF)在自动目标检测/识别中取得了很好的效果。将过滤系数作为最大类分离度量的解,从而获得最优性能。最近,一种基于RQQCF的ATR变换域方法被提出,称为变换域RQQCF (TDRQQCF)。TDRQQCF通过压缩设计QCF时使用的目标和杂波数据,大大降低了计算复杂度和存储需求。此外,当滤波器与目标和杂波图像相关时,TDRQQCF方法能够产生更大的响应。在保持原有空间域RQQCF算法优异识别精度的同时实现了这一目标。RQQCF和TDRQQCF的计算涉及A1 = Rx + Ry项的倒数,其中Rx和Ry分别是目标和杂波的样本自相关矩阵。可以推测,TDRQQCF方法相当于正则化A1。一种常见的正则化方法包括执行A1的特征值分解(EVD),将一些小的特征值设置为零,然后重建A1,现在预计A1的条件会更好。本文对这种正则化方法进行了研究,并与TDRQQCF进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信