On the issue of law principles perception in different concepts of legal understanding

Vera A. Ilyukhina
{"title":"On the issue of law principles perception in different concepts of legal understanding","authors":"Vera A. Ilyukhina","doi":"10.20310/2587-9340-2023-7-1-7-16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present research is devoted to the study of law principles perception in different legal understanding concepts. The purpose of work is to analyze the concept and place of law principles in the legal system within the framework of various types of legal understanding, and the tasks of work are the law principles perception in the natural law concept by R. Dworkin, the libertarian theory of law by V.S. Nersesyants, positivist and integrative legal understanding. It is substantiated that the law principles concept, the allocation of their types and the definition of their role in the legal system is largely due to the type of legal understanding, which the scientist is a supporter of. Emphasis is placed on the axiological component of the studied approaches in relation to the law principles. It is proved that the natural-legal, liberal, positivist and integrative types of legal understanding allow focusing on the aspects of legal reality associated with various kinds of ideas in the field of law. It is concluded that in terms of law enforcement, the positivist approach is of the greatest importance, since it allows the subjects of law not only to understand the main ideas embodied in the legislation, but also orients them towards the practical implementation of normatively defined law principles. Natural-legal, liberal and, to some extent, integrative approaches have theoretical and methodological value – they do not directly matter for the regulation of social relations, but form the legislator's idea of the value of certain ideas, the possibility of their consolidation in the texts of normative legal acts and hence their further practical implementation.","PeriodicalId":183203,"journal":{"name":"Current Issues of the State and Law","volume":"84 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Issues of the State and Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-9340-2023-7-1-7-16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The present research is devoted to the study of law principles perception in different legal understanding concepts. The purpose of work is to analyze the concept and place of law principles in the legal system within the framework of various types of legal understanding, and the tasks of work are the law principles perception in the natural law concept by R. Dworkin, the libertarian theory of law by V.S. Nersesyants, positivist and integrative legal understanding. It is substantiated that the law principles concept, the allocation of their types and the definition of their role in the legal system is largely due to the type of legal understanding, which the scientist is a supporter of. Emphasis is placed on the axiological component of the studied approaches in relation to the law principles. It is proved that the natural-legal, liberal, positivist and integrative types of legal understanding allow focusing on the aspects of legal reality associated with various kinds of ideas in the field of law. It is concluded that in terms of law enforcement, the positivist approach is of the greatest importance, since it allows the subjects of law not only to understand the main ideas embodied in the legislation, but also orients them towards the practical implementation of normatively defined law principles. Natural-legal, liberal and, to some extent, integrative approaches have theoretical and methodological value – they do not directly matter for the regulation of social relations, but form the legislator's idea of the value of certain ideas, the possibility of their consolidation in the texts of normative legal acts and hence their further practical implementation.
关于法律原则认知问题,不同概念的法律理解
本研究致力于研究不同法律理解概念下的法律原则感知。工作的目的是在各种类型的法律理解框架内分析法律原则在法律体系中的概念和地位,工作的任务是r.d workin的自然法概念中的法律原则感知,V.S. Nersesyants的自由主义法律理论,实证主义和综合法律理解。事实证明,法律原则的概念、类型的配置以及在法律体系中作用的界定在很大程度上取决于科学家所支持的法律理解类型。重点放在与法律原则有关的研究方法的价值论成分上。事实证明,自然法学、自由主义、实证主义和综合类型的法律理解允许将重点放在与法律领域的各种思想相关的法律现实方面。结论是,就执法而言,实证主义方法是最重要的,因为它使法律主体不仅能够理解立法所体现的主要思想,而且还能引导他们实际执行规范定义的法律原则。自然法的、自由主义的以及在某种程度上综合的方法具有理论和方法上的价值——它们对社会关系的调节没有直接影响,但形成了立法者对某些观念价值的观念,形成了它们在规范性法律行为文本中得到巩固的可能性,从而形成了它们进一步的实际实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信