60 Patent foramen ovale (pfo) closure service evaluation: remote mdt, local anaesthesia and intracardiac echo (ice) during the covid-19 pandemic

Hussein A. Taqi, A. Uddin, M. Sosin, K. Krishnan, William Smith
{"title":"60 Patent foramen ovale (pfo) closure service evaluation: remote mdt, local anaesthesia and intracardiac echo (ice) during the covid-19 pandemic","authors":"Hussein A. Taqi, A. Uddin, M. Sosin, K. Krishnan, William Smith","doi":"10.1136/heartjnl-2022-bcs.60","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"60 Table 1Basic characteristics and vascular risk factors in two groupsCharacteristics Closure group (n=38) MM group (n=40) P value Median age 45 54 0.001 Age range 21-65 23-79 Highest age group 30-39 (n=12) & 50-59 (n=12) 50-59 (n=14) Males 23 (61%) 25 (62%) 0.43 Females 15 (39%) 15 (38%) Diabetes 2 (5%) 8 (20%) 0.02 Hypertension 6 (15%) 18 (45%) 0.002 Current smokers 6 (15%) 5 (12.5%) 0.41 Ex-smokers 4 (11%) 4 (10%) 0.46 Hyperlipidaemia 13 (34%) 23 (57%) 0.018 60 Figure 1PFO MDTs outcome closure group 48% (n=38), Medical Management group 51% (n=40) and one patients is waiting to be reviewed to decide about the closure[Figure omitted. See PDF] 60 Figure 2RoPE score is used to identify the patients whose PFOs are likely to be pathogenic rather than incidental. The score involves multiple variables based on vascular risk factors such as diabetes, hypertension, prior history of stroke or TIA and smoking history as well as patientsage and stroke features (cortical and non cortical infarcts)[Figure omitted. See PDF]ConclusionPFO closures at NUH were deemed to be safe day case procedures with no pressure placed on either the TOE or GA services by performing cases under LA and using ICE during the COVID-19 pandemic. A robust and evidence-based practice was followed to choose the suitable patients for the procedure in structured MDT meetings ensuring equitable access for all surrounding hospitals.Conflict of InterestNone","PeriodicalId":102313,"journal":{"name":"Acute Coronary Syndromes & Interventional Cardiology","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acute Coronary Syndromes & Interventional Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2022-bcs.60","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

60 Table 1Basic characteristics and vascular risk factors in two groupsCharacteristics Closure group (n=38) MM group (n=40) P value Median age 45 54 0.001 Age range 21-65 23-79 Highest age group 30-39 (n=12) & 50-59 (n=12) 50-59 (n=14) Males 23 (61%) 25 (62%) 0.43 Females 15 (39%) 15 (38%) Diabetes 2 (5%) 8 (20%) 0.02 Hypertension 6 (15%) 18 (45%) 0.002 Current smokers 6 (15%) 5 (12.5%) 0.41 Ex-smokers 4 (11%) 4 (10%) 0.46 Hyperlipidaemia 13 (34%) 23 (57%) 0.018 60 Figure 1PFO MDTs outcome closure group 48% (n=38), Medical Management group 51% (n=40) and one patients is waiting to be reviewed to decide about the closure[Figure omitted. See PDF] 60 Figure 2RoPE score is used to identify the patients whose PFOs are likely to be pathogenic rather than incidental. The score involves multiple variables based on vascular risk factors such as diabetes, hypertension, prior history of stroke or TIA and smoking history as well as patientsage and stroke features (cortical and non cortical infarcts)[Figure omitted. See PDF]ConclusionPFO closures at NUH were deemed to be safe day case procedures with no pressure placed on either the TOE or GA services by performing cases under LA and using ICE during the COVID-19 pandemic. A robust and evidence-based practice was followed to choose the suitable patients for the procedure in structured MDT meetings ensuring equitable access for all surrounding hospitals.Conflict of InterestNone
60卵圆孔未闭(pfo)闭合服务评价:新冠肺炎大流行期间远程mdt、局部麻醉和心内回声(ice)
表1 60基本特征和血管危险因素在两个groupsCharacteristics关闭组(n = 38) MM组(n = 40) P值平均年龄45 54 0.001年龄21 - 65年龄段最高23 - 79 - 39 (n = 12) 50 50 - 59岁(n = 12) & 59 (n = 14)男性23(61%)25(62%)0.43女性15(39%)15(38%)糖尿病2(5%)8(20%)0.02高血压6例(15%)18(45%)0.002吸烟者6(15%)5(12.5%)0.41人4 (11%)4 (10%)0.46 Hyperlipidaemia 13(34%) 23(57%) 0.018 60图1卵圆孔未闭联合化疗的结果闭合组48% (n=38),医疗管理组51% (n=40), 1例患者等待复诊决定闭合[图略]。[PDF] 60图2RoPE评分用于识别可能是致病性而非偶发性PFOs的患者。评分涉及基于血管危险因素的多个变量,如糖尿病、高血压、卒中或TIA病史、吸烟史以及患者和卒中特征(皮质性和非皮质性梗死)[图略]。结论NUH的pfo关闭被认为是安全的日间病例程序,在COVID-19大流行期间根据LA和ICE执行病例,不会给TOE或GA服务带来压力。在结构化的MDT会议上,采用了一种强有力的循证实践来选择合适的患者,以确保所有周边医院都能公平获得该程序。利益冲突无
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信