Detection of Black Sigatoka Disease on Banana Leaves Using ShuffleNet V2 CNN Architecture in Comparison to SVM and KNN Techniques

A. Yumang, Jonathan M. Baguisi, Baird Rouan S. Buenaventura, C. Paglinawan
{"title":"Detection of Black Sigatoka Disease on Banana Leaves Using ShuffleNet V2 CNN Architecture in Comparison to SVM and KNN Techniques","authors":"A. Yumang, Jonathan M. Baguisi, Baird Rouan S. Buenaventura, C. Paglinawan","doi":"10.1109/ICCAE56788.2023.10111367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, the Shufflenet V2 Convolutional Neural Network Architecture is used to detect Black Sigatoka Disease in banana leaves. This architecture is used to compare its results in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity with different algorithms that also have been applied to the same scenario. Shufflenet V2 CNN is compared to the Support Vector Machine and K-nearest Neighbor in this case. Image classification has been a helpful tool. Its application detects anomalies and physical manifestations in different cases, such as agriculture and biomedical. Image classification uses different algorithms for its process, and each varies in performance. Thus, this study is made to see the percentage differences in this specific application. The CNN model is trained first by feeding it with data of healthy and Black Sigatoka infected banana leaf images in raw and augmented forms. The trained model is then deployed to a Raspberry Pi device prototype, wherein leaf samples are used as test data. The results of this test garnered 95% accuracy, 96.67% sensitivity, and 93.33% specificity. This ShuffleNet V2 CNN trained model's results are compared to the results of both algorithms, SVM and KNN.","PeriodicalId":406112,"journal":{"name":"2023 15th International Conference on Computer and Automation Engineering (ICCAE)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 15th International Conference on Computer and Automation Engineering (ICCAE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCAE56788.2023.10111367","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, the Shufflenet V2 Convolutional Neural Network Architecture is used to detect Black Sigatoka Disease in banana leaves. This architecture is used to compare its results in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity with different algorithms that also have been applied to the same scenario. Shufflenet V2 CNN is compared to the Support Vector Machine and K-nearest Neighbor in this case. Image classification has been a helpful tool. Its application detects anomalies and physical manifestations in different cases, such as agriculture and biomedical. Image classification uses different algorithms for its process, and each varies in performance. Thus, this study is made to see the percentage differences in this specific application. The CNN model is trained first by feeding it with data of healthy and Black Sigatoka infected banana leaf images in raw and augmented forms. The trained model is then deployed to a Raspberry Pi device prototype, wherein leaf samples are used as test data. The results of this test garnered 95% accuracy, 96.67% sensitivity, and 93.33% specificity. This ShuffleNet V2 CNN trained model's results are compared to the results of both algorithms, SVM and KNN.
基于ShuffleNet V2 CNN架构的香蕉叶片黑叶斑病检测与SVM和KNN技术的比较
本文采用Shufflenet V2卷积神经网络架构对香蕉叶片黑叶斑病进行检测。该架构用于将其结果与应用于同一场景的不同算法在准确性、灵敏度和特异性方面进行比较。在这种情况下,将Shufflenet V2 CNN与支持向量机和k近邻进行比较。图像分类已经成为一个有用的工具。它的应用是检测不同情况下的异常和物理表现,如农业和生物医学。图像分类过程使用不同的算法,每种算法的性能各不相同。因此,本研究的目的是查看这个特定应用程序中的百分比差异。CNN模型首先通过输入原始和增强形式的健康和黑叶斑病感染香蕉叶图像数据进行训练。然后将训练好的模型部署到树莓派设备原型中,其中叶子样本用作测试数据。结果准确率为95%,灵敏度为96.67%,特异性为93.33%。将该ShuffleNet V2 CNN训练模型的结果与SVM和KNN两种算法的结果进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信