Accurate statistical approaches for generating representative workload compositions

L. Eeckhout, R. Sundareswara, J. Yi, D. Lilja, Paul Schrater
{"title":"Accurate statistical approaches for generating representative workload compositions","authors":"L. Eeckhout, R. Sundareswara, J. Yi, D. Lilja, Paul Schrater","doi":"10.1109/IISWC.2005.1526001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Composing a representative workload is a crucial step during the design process of a microprocessor. The workload should be composed in such a way that it is representative for the target domain of application and yet, the amount of redundancy in the workload should be minimized as much as possible in order not to overly increase the total simulation time. As a result, there is an important trade-off that needs to be made between workload representativeness and simulation accuracy versus simulation speed. Previous work used statistical data analysis techniques to identify representative benchmarks and corresponding inputs, also called a subset, from a large set of potential benchmarks and inputs. These methodologies measure a number of program characteristics on which principal components analysis (PCA) is applied before identifying distinct program behaviors among the benchmarks using cluster analysis. In this paper we propose independent components analysis (ICA) as a better alternative to PCA as it does not assume that the original data set has a Gaussian distribution, which allows ICA to better find the important axes in the workload space. Our experimental results using SPEC CPU2000 benchmarks show that ICA significantly outperforms PCA in that ICA achieves smaller benchmark subsets that are more accurate than those found by PCA.","PeriodicalId":275514,"journal":{"name":"IEEE International. 2005 Proceedings of the IEEE Workload Characterization Symposium, 2005.","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE International. 2005 Proceedings of the IEEE Workload Characterization Symposium, 2005.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IISWC.2005.1526001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

Composing a representative workload is a crucial step during the design process of a microprocessor. The workload should be composed in such a way that it is representative for the target domain of application and yet, the amount of redundancy in the workload should be minimized as much as possible in order not to overly increase the total simulation time. As a result, there is an important trade-off that needs to be made between workload representativeness and simulation accuracy versus simulation speed. Previous work used statistical data analysis techniques to identify representative benchmarks and corresponding inputs, also called a subset, from a large set of potential benchmarks and inputs. These methodologies measure a number of program characteristics on which principal components analysis (PCA) is applied before identifying distinct program behaviors among the benchmarks using cluster analysis. In this paper we propose independent components analysis (ICA) as a better alternative to PCA as it does not assume that the original data set has a Gaussian distribution, which allows ICA to better find the important axes in the workload space. Our experimental results using SPEC CPU2000 benchmarks show that ICA significantly outperforms PCA in that ICA achieves smaller benchmark subsets that are more accurate than those found by PCA.
用于生成代表性工作负载组合的准确统计方法
组成代表性工作负载是微处理器设计过程中的关键步骤。工作负载的组成方式应该能够代表应用程序的目标领域,但是,工作负载中的冗余量应该尽可能地最小化,以免过度增加总模拟时间。因此,需要在工作负载代表性和仿真精度与仿真速度之间进行重要的权衡。以前的工作使用统计数据分析技术从大量潜在的基准和输入中识别具有代表性的基准和相应的输入,也称为子集。在使用聚类分析确定基准中的不同程序行为之前,这些方法测量了许多应用主成分分析(PCA)的程序特征。在本文中,我们提出独立分量分析(ICA)作为PCA的更好替代方案,因为它不假设原始数据集具有高斯分布,这使得ICA能够更好地找到工作负载空间中的重要轴。我们使用SPEC CPU2000基准测试的实验结果表明,ICA显著优于PCA,因为ICA实现了比PCA更准确的更小的基准子集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信