On Using GEV or Gumbel Models When Applying EVT for Probabilistic WCET Estimation

Karila Palma Silva, Luis Fernando Arcaro, R. S. Oliveira
{"title":"On Using GEV or Gumbel Models When Applying EVT for Probabilistic WCET Estimation","authors":"Karila Palma Silva, Luis Fernando Arcaro, R. S. Oliveira","doi":"10.1109/RTSS.2017.00028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The technique known as Measurement-Based Probabilistic Timing Analysis (MBPTA) promises producing Worst-Case Execution Time (WCET) bounds for real-time systems' tasks based on the analysis of execution time measurements through Extreme Value Theory (EVT), a statistical framework designed to estimate the probability of extreme events. For that MBPTA requires the analysed tasks' maximum observed execution times to adhere to an extreme value distribution, such as Gumbel or Generalized Extreme Value (GEV), and allows determining execution time values expected to be exceeded only with arbitrarily small probabilities. Several works on the area assume that the Gumbel model should be employed in such analysis, while others consider GEV, which generalizes Weibull, Gumbel and Fréchet models, would be more adequate. In this work we perform an empirical assessment on the reliability and tightness of the WCET bounds determined through the GEV and Gumbel models. We do so by comparing the yielded estimates and their associated confidence intervals against the maximum values observed on large samples (e.g. of size 100 million), of both real and synthetic nature, as the modelling sample size is increased.","PeriodicalId":407932,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium (RTSS)","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium (RTSS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RTSS.2017.00028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

The technique known as Measurement-Based Probabilistic Timing Analysis (MBPTA) promises producing Worst-Case Execution Time (WCET) bounds for real-time systems' tasks based on the analysis of execution time measurements through Extreme Value Theory (EVT), a statistical framework designed to estimate the probability of extreme events. For that MBPTA requires the analysed tasks' maximum observed execution times to adhere to an extreme value distribution, such as Gumbel or Generalized Extreme Value (GEV), and allows determining execution time values expected to be exceeded only with arbitrarily small probabilities. Several works on the area assume that the Gumbel model should be employed in such analysis, while others consider GEV, which generalizes Weibull, Gumbel and Fréchet models, would be more adequate. In this work we perform an empirical assessment on the reliability and tightness of the WCET bounds determined through the GEV and Gumbel models. We do so by comparing the yielded estimates and their associated confidence intervals against the maximum values observed on large samples (e.g. of size 100 million), of both real and synthetic nature, as the modelling sample size is increased.
应用EVT进行概率WCET估计时使用GEV或Gumbel模型
基于测量的概率时序分析(MBPTA)技术承诺通过极值理论(EVT)对执行时间测量的分析,为实时系统的任务产生最坏情况执行时间(WCET)界限,EVT是一种旨在估计极端事件概率的统计框架。为此,MBPTA要求所分析的任务的最大观察执行时间遵循一个极值分布,如Gumbel或广义极值(GEV),并允许仅在任意小概率的情况下确定预期超过的执行时间值。这一领域的一些研究认为应该采用Gumbel模型进行分析,而另一些研究则认为概括了Weibull、Gumbel和fr切特模型的GEV模型更合适。在这项工作中,我们对通过GEV和Gumbel模型确定的WCET边界的可靠性和严密性进行了实证评估。当模型样本量增加时,我们通过比较产生的估计及其相关的置信区间与在真实和合成性质的大样本(例如规模为1亿)上观察到的最大值来做到这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信