КОМУНІКАЦІЙНІ СТРАТЕГІЇ ПРОПАГАНДИСТСЬКОГО ДОКУМЕНТАЛЬНОГО КОНТЕНТУ ЯК ІНСТРУМЕНТ НАРАТИВНОГО РЕГУЛЮВАННЯ

V. Kovpak, M. Troino
{"title":"КОМУНІКАЦІЙНІ СТРАТЕГІЇ ПРОПАГАНДИСТСЬКОГО ДОКУМЕНТАЛЬНОГО КОНТЕНТУ ЯК ІНСТРУМЕНТ НАРАТИВНОГО РЕГУЛЮВАННЯ","authors":"V. Kovpak, M. Troino","doi":"10.32840/cpu2219-8741/2023.1(53).2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the study is to analyze the communication strategies of propaganda documentary content as an instrument of narrative regulation in the information space.Research methodology. The following methods were used in the study: classification (types of communication strategies), discourse analysis (content analysis taking into account historical, political, and social circumstances), systematic approach (taking into account the peculiarities of the media landscape of the Russian propaganda information space), and synchronous method (focusing on the conditions of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine). Results. The article characterizes the concepts of «narrative strategies», «communication strategies», «narrative bias», and «narrative regulation» in social communications. Despite the different platforms and target audiences, the narrative strategies of documentary content on the RT TV channel (on the example of the documentary «Maidan: Turn to War» (March 5, 2022)) and on the author’s YouTube channel «Stas wow how simple» (the documentary «Donbas Diary. How I was in the war») are absolutely identical. The Kremlin narratives are wrapped in blatant manipulation of human emotions, lack of facts, and are promoted by communication strategies of framing, priming, «agenda-setting», destructive multiplicity of narratives, as well as audiovisual tools of film narration, which help to regulate the narrative of the hostile information space. The scientific novelty lies in the revealed mechanics of the use of communication strategies in the documentary content of the state television channel Russia Today (RT) and the author’s YouTube channel «Stas wow how simple» on the example of documentaries on the Revolution of Dignity and the Russian-Ukrainian war of 2014 for the narrative regulation of this issue in the information space.Practical meaning. The practical significance of the study and the prospects of researching the narrative practices of the Russian-Ukrainian war are evidenced by the analyzed trends in the applied communication strategies of propaganda documentary content as a tool for narrative regulation in the information space, since the revealed narrativization allows us to trace grand narratives and sub-narratives, to identify concepts, means of their presentation – narrative strategies, communication strategies for their implementation, and the role of the so-called narrators-regulators who determine the narrative.Key words: narrative bias, narrative regulation, dominant narratives, sub-narratives, communication strategies, documentary content.","PeriodicalId":345460,"journal":{"name":"State and Regions. Series: Social Communications","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"State and Regions. Series: Social Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32840/cpu2219-8741/2023.1(53).2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to analyze the communication strategies of propaganda documentary content as an instrument of narrative regulation in the information space.Research methodology. The following methods were used in the study: classification (types of communication strategies), discourse analysis (content analysis taking into account historical, political, and social circumstances), systematic approach (taking into account the peculiarities of the media landscape of the Russian propaganda information space), and synchronous method (focusing on the conditions of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine). Results. The article characterizes the concepts of «narrative strategies», «communication strategies», «narrative bias», and «narrative regulation» in social communications. Despite the different platforms and target audiences, the narrative strategies of documentary content on the RT TV channel (on the example of the documentary «Maidan: Turn to War» (March 5, 2022)) and on the author’s YouTube channel «Stas wow how simple» (the documentary «Donbas Diary. How I was in the war») are absolutely identical. The Kremlin narratives are wrapped in blatant manipulation of human emotions, lack of facts, and are promoted by communication strategies of framing, priming, «agenda-setting», destructive multiplicity of narratives, as well as audiovisual tools of film narration, which help to regulate the narrative of the hostile information space. The scientific novelty lies in the revealed mechanics of the use of communication strategies in the documentary content of the state television channel Russia Today (RT) and the author’s YouTube channel «Stas wow how simple» on the example of documentaries on the Revolution of Dignity and the Russian-Ukrainian war of 2014 for the narrative regulation of this issue in the information space.Practical meaning. The practical significance of the study and the prospects of researching the narrative practices of the Russian-Ukrainian war are evidenced by the analyzed trends in the applied communication strategies of propaganda documentary content as a tool for narrative regulation in the information space, since the revealed narrativization allows us to trace grand narratives and sub-narratives, to identify concepts, means of their presentation – narrative strategies, communication strategies for their implementation, and the role of the so-called narrators-regulators who determine the narrative.Key words: narrative bias, narrative regulation, dominant narratives, sub-narratives, communication strategies, documentary content.
本研究的目的是分析作为叙事调节工具的宣传纪录片内容在信息空间中的传播策略。研究方法。研究中使用了以下方法:分类(传播策略的类型)、话语分析(考虑历史、政治和社会环境的内容分析)、系统方法(考虑俄罗斯宣传信息空间媒体景观的特殊性)和同步方法(关注俄罗斯全面入侵乌克兰的条件)。结果。本文阐述了社会传播中的“叙事策略”、“传播策略”、“叙事偏见”和“叙事规则”等概念。尽管平台和目标受众不同,但RT电视频道(以纪录片《独立广场:转向战争》(2022年3月5日)为例)和作者的YouTube频道“Stas wow how simple”(纪录片《顿巴斯日记》)的纪录片内容的叙事策略都很简单。我在战争中是怎样的?)是完全一样的。克里姆林宫的叙事被包裹在对人类情感的公然操纵中,缺乏事实,并通过框架、启动、“议程设置”、叙事的破坏性多样性以及电影叙事的视听工具等传播策略来促进,这些策略有助于规范敌对信息空间的叙事。科学的新颖性在于,在国家电视频道“今日俄罗斯”(RT)和作者的YouTube频道“Stas wow how simple”的纪录片内容中揭示了使用传播策略的机制,以关于尊严革命和2014年俄乌战争的纪录片为例,在信息空间中对这一问题进行叙事调节。现实意义。通过分析宣传纪录片内容在信息空间中作为叙事调节工具的应用传播策略的趋势,证明了本研究的现实意义和研究俄乌战争叙事实践的前景,因为揭示的叙事使我们能够追踪大叙事和次叙事,识别它们的概念,呈现方式-叙事策略,传播策略的实施,以及所谓的叙述者的角色——决定叙事的监管者。关键词:叙事偏见、叙事调节、主导叙事、次叙事、传播策略、纪录片内容
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信