The Problem with the State Sovereignty of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania during the Reign of Alexander Yahailavich (1492–1501)

Vasil Varonin
{"title":"The Problem with the State Sovereignty of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania during the Reign of Alexander Yahailavich (1492–1501)","authors":"Vasil Varonin","doi":"10.15407/ul2021.06.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The death of Kazimir IV Yahailavich in 1492 led to the break of the personal union between the Kingdom of Poland and Grand Duchy of Lithuania. These two states had got separate monarchs, who became the sons of Kazimir – Jan Olbracht and Alexander. The period of 1492–1501, the Alexander’s reign in the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, was a serious test for the independence of this state. The transition from a personal to the more formal dynastical union had been thrown the Grand Duchy before a hard dilemma. On the one hand it wanted to keep the alliance with Poland that already had a long historical tradition, was supported by a large body of agreements and provided its benefits. On the other hand the Grand Duchy sought to defend its sovereign rights that the Poland had not recognized always. There are a number of facts that could proof the perception by Poland and Jan Olbracht of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania and Alexander as subordinated powers. For instance, Jan Olbracht named himself as a Supreme Duke of Lithuania. He used to conclude international agreements in the name of Aleksandr. The King of Poland tried to appoint the Catholic bishops in the Grand Duchy of Lithuania. In his tern Alexander sometimes emphatically referred to him as his elder brother in official documents. He also used to mint coins with the coat of arms of not only the Grand Duchy of Lithuania but also the Kingdom of Poland. Specific features at that time was that they were strongly conditioned by the family ties of two monarchs. All of Kazimir’s sons, including Jan Olbracht and Alexander sought to maintain family and dynastic unity, to support each other. It came in full force in the international relations. For example two or even three of the Yahajlavichy brothers could enter into an agreement with foreign states. In general, we can say that some signs of dependence of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania on Kingdom of Poland, which still be traced, belonged mainly to the external, symbolic attributes of statehood. They hardly hurt the fundamental principles of sovereignty of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania. The more acute problem was the union between the two states. The conditions to elect Alexander as a King of Poland was a new bilateral agreement. The Piotrkau-Mielnik Union of 1501 became such an agreement. In actual fact, it covered a fusion of two states into the one country, one king, one soim (parliament) and so on. But this plan had never become truth. The ratification of the union was postponed for a long time in the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, and in 1505 it was denied any approves at all. As a result, the states turned back to the personal union, to that type of relations exciting before 1492. For the Grand Duchy of Lithuania it meant to keep on the sovereign state status.","PeriodicalId":177521,"journal":{"name":"Ukraina Lithuanica. Studìï z ìstorìï Velikogo knâzìvstva Litovsʹkogo","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ukraina Lithuanica. Studìï z ìstorìï Velikogo knâzìvstva Litovsʹkogo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15407/ul2021.06.018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The death of Kazimir IV Yahailavich in 1492 led to the break of the personal union between the Kingdom of Poland and Grand Duchy of Lithuania. These two states had got separate monarchs, who became the sons of Kazimir – Jan Olbracht and Alexander. The period of 1492–1501, the Alexander’s reign in the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, was a serious test for the independence of this state. The transition from a personal to the more formal dynastical union had been thrown the Grand Duchy before a hard dilemma. On the one hand it wanted to keep the alliance with Poland that already had a long historical tradition, was supported by a large body of agreements and provided its benefits. On the other hand the Grand Duchy sought to defend its sovereign rights that the Poland had not recognized always. There are a number of facts that could proof the perception by Poland and Jan Olbracht of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania and Alexander as subordinated powers. For instance, Jan Olbracht named himself as a Supreme Duke of Lithuania. He used to conclude international agreements in the name of Aleksandr. The King of Poland tried to appoint the Catholic bishops in the Grand Duchy of Lithuania. In his tern Alexander sometimes emphatically referred to him as his elder brother in official documents. He also used to mint coins with the coat of arms of not only the Grand Duchy of Lithuania but also the Kingdom of Poland. Specific features at that time was that they were strongly conditioned by the family ties of two monarchs. All of Kazimir’s sons, including Jan Olbracht and Alexander sought to maintain family and dynastic unity, to support each other. It came in full force in the international relations. For example two or even three of the Yahajlavichy brothers could enter into an agreement with foreign states. In general, we can say that some signs of dependence of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania on Kingdom of Poland, which still be traced, belonged mainly to the external, symbolic attributes of statehood. They hardly hurt the fundamental principles of sovereignty of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania. The more acute problem was the union between the two states. The conditions to elect Alexander as a King of Poland was a new bilateral agreement. The Piotrkau-Mielnik Union of 1501 became such an agreement. In actual fact, it covered a fusion of two states into the one country, one king, one soim (parliament) and so on. But this plan had never become truth. The ratification of the union was postponed for a long time in the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, and in 1505 it was denied any approves at all. As a result, the states turned back to the personal union, to that type of relations exciting before 1492. For the Grand Duchy of Lithuania it meant to keep on the sovereign state status.
亚历山大·亚海拉维奇统治时期立陶宛大公国的国家主权问题(1492-1501)
1492年,卡齐米尔四世·亚海拉维奇去世,导致波兰王国和立陶宛大公国个人联盟的破裂。这两个国家有各自的君主,他们是卡齐米尔的儿子——扬·奥尔布拉赫特和亚历山大。1492年至1501年,亚历山大在立陶宛大公国的统治时期,是对这个国家独立性的严峻考验。从个人联盟到更正式的王朝联盟的转变让大公国陷入了两难的境地。一方面,它希望保持与波兰的联盟关系,波兰已经有了悠久的历史传统,得到了大量协议的支持,并为波兰提供了利益。另一方面,大公国试图捍卫波兰一直不承认的主权权利。有许多事实可以证明波兰和扬·奥尔布拉赫特认为立陶宛大公国和亚历山大是从属国家。例如,Jan Olbracht称自己为立陶宛最高公爵。他过去常常以亚历山大的名义缔结国际协定。波兰国王试图任命立陶宛大公国的天主教主教。在他任期内,亚历山大有时在官方文件中强调他是他的哥哥。他还铸造了带有立陶宛大公国和波兰王国盾徽的硬币。当时的具体特点是,它们受到两位君主的家庭关系的强烈制约。卡齐米尔的所有儿子,包括扬·奥尔布拉赫特和亚历山大,都试图保持家族和王朝的团结,互相支持。它在国际关系中发挥了巨大的作用。例如,Yahajlavichy兄弟中的两个甚至三个可以与外国达成协议。总的来说,我们可以说立陶宛大公国对波兰王国的一些依赖迹象,这些迹象仍然可以追溯到,主要属于国家地位的外部象征属性。它们几乎没有损害立陶宛大公国主权的基本原则。更尖锐的问题是两个州的联合。选举亚历山大为波兰国王的条件是一项新的双边协议。1501年的皮奥特考-米尔尼克联盟就是这样一个协议。事实上,它涵盖了两个国家融合成一个国家,一个国王,一个soim(议会)等等。但这个计划从未成为现实。在立陶宛大公国,批准该联盟被推迟了很长时间,1505年,它被拒绝批准。结果,各州又回到了个人联盟,回到了1492年之前那种令人兴奋的关系。对于立陶宛大公国来说,这意味着保持主权国家的地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信