Knowledge management practice and the selection of approaches: A Thailand study

R. Sinthavalai
{"title":"Knowledge management practice and the selection of approaches: A Thailand study","authors":"R. Sinthavalai","doi":"10.1109/IEMCE.2008.4618027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Knowledge management (KM) has increased the importance to be an issue of interests to management of the organization. In Thailand, the rapid grow of KM application results in widely practice of KM in all sizes and types of organizations. However, some of them perceive KM as fad or fashion of management; some only adopt the application and give the label for KM without the understanding of its concept. In contrast, some organizations practice KM tools and those work well even without the KM label. The objectives of this paper could be classified as three issues. The first objective was to critically review the KM basis. The second objective was to discuss the opportunities to apply KM in Thai organization. The culture analysis was an attempt to determine Thai culture whether to support KM practice. This part also discussed the current KM application in Thai organizations. Thirdly, it was to highlight the importance of considering the KM objectives of each organizations, culture and people behavior. There is no complete package of KM that can suit for all type and size of organizations and technology is not the absolute solution for KM. The attempt of this paper was to enable the organization selecting the appropriate approaches for KM. In other words, KM needs to be customized to suit each organizational context. The paper proposed the application of house of quality (HoQ) as the support tool to design KM approaches.","PeriodicalId":408691,"journal":{"name":"2008 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMCE.2008.4618027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Knowledge management (KM) has increased the importance to be an issue of interests to management of the organization. In Thailand, the rapid grow of KM application results in widely practice of KM in all sizes and types of organizations. However, some of them perceive KM as fad or fashion of management; some only adopt the application and give the label for KM without the understanding of its concept. In contrast, some organizations practice KM tools and those work well even without the KM label. The objectives of this paper could be classified as three issues. The first objective was to critically review the KM basis. The second objective was to discuss the opportunities to apply KM in Thai organization. The culture analysis was an attempt to determine Thai culture whether to support KM practice. This part also discussed the current KM application in Thai organizations. Thirdly, it was to highlight the importance of considering the KM objectives of each organizations, culture and people behavior. There is no complete package of KM that can suit for all type and size of organizations and technology is not the absolute solution for KM. The attempt of this paper was to enable the organization selecting the appropriate approaches for KM. In other words, KM needs to be customized to suit each organizational context. The paper proposed the application of house of quality (HoQ) as the support tool to design KM approaches.
知识管理实践与方法选择:泰国研究
知识管理(KM)已日益成为组织管理层关心的问题。在泰国,知识管理应用的快速增长导致了知识管理在各种规模和类型的组织中的广泛实践。然而,他们中的一些人认为知识管理是一种时尚或管理时尚;有的企业在不了解知识管理概念的情况下,只采用应用程序,给知识管理贴上标签。相比之下,一些组织实践了知识管理工具,即使没有知识管理的标签,这些工具也能很好地工作。本文的目标可分为三个问题。第一个目标是严格审查知识管理的基础。第二个目标是讨论在泰国组织中应用知识管理的机会。文化分析是试图确定泰国文化是否支持KM实践。这一部分还讨论了当前泰国组织中知识管理的应用。第三,它是为了强调考虑每个组织、文化和人员行为的知识管理目标的重要性。没有一个完整的知识管理包可以适合所有类型和规模的组织,技术也不是知识管理的绝对解决方案。本文的尝试是使组织能够选择合适的知识管理方法。换句话说,需要定制KM以适应每个组织环境。本文提出将质量屋(house of quality, HoQ)作为知识管理方法设计的辅助工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信