Recommendation Networks and the Long Tail of Electronic Commerce

Gal Oestreicher-Singer, A. Sundararajan
{"title":"Recommendation Networks and the Long Tail of Electronic Commerce","authors":"Gal Oestreicher-Singer, A. Sundararajan","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1324064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It has been conjectured that the peer-based recommendations associated with electronic commerce lead to a redistribution of demand from popular products or \"blockbusters\" to less popular or \"niche\" products, and that electronic markets will therefore be characterized by a \"long tail\" of demand and revenue. We test this conjecture using the revenue distributions of books in over 200 distinct categories on Amazon.com and detailed daily snapshots of co-purchase recommendation networks that products of these categories are situated in. We measure how much a product is influenced by its position in this hyperlinked network of recommendations using a variant of Google's PageRank measure of centrality. We then associate the average influence of the network on each category with the inequality in the distribution of its demand and revenue, quantifying this inequality using the Gini coefficient derived from the category's Lorenz curve. We establish that categories whose products are influenced more by the recommendation network have significantly flatter demand and revenue distributions, even after controlling for variation in average category demand, category's size and price differentials. Our empirical findings indicate that doubling the average network influence on a category is associated with an average increase of about 50% in the relative revenue for the least popular 20% of products, and with an average reduction of about 15% in the relative revenue for the most popular 20% of products. We also show that this effect is enhanced by higher assortative mixing and lower clustering in the network, and is greater in categories whose products are more evenly influenced by recommendations. The direction of these results persists over time, across both demand and revenue distributions, and across both daily and weekly demand aggregations. Our work illustrates how the microscopic economic data revealed by online networks can be used to define and answer new kinds of research questions, offers a fresh perspective on the influence of networked IT artifacts on business outcomes, and provides novel empirical evidence about the impact of visible recommendations on the long tail of electronic commerce.","PeriodicalId":321301,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Marketing","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"239","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1324064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 239

Abstract

It has been conjectured that the peer-based recommendations associated with electronic commerce lead to a redistribution of demand from popular products or "blockbusters" to less popular or "niche" products, and that electronic markets will therefore be characterized by a "long tail" of demand and revenue. We test this conjecture using the revenue distributions of books in over 200 distinct categories on Amazon.com and detailed daily snapshots of co-purchase recommendation networks that products of these categories are situated in. We measure how much a product is influenced by its position in this hyperlinked network of recommendations using a variant of Google's PageRank measure of centrality. We then associate the average influence of the network on each category with the inequality in the distribution of its demand and revenue, quantifying this inequality using the Gini coefficient derived from the category's Lorenz curve. We establish that categories whose products are influenced more by the recommendation network have significantly flatter demand and revenue distributions, even after controlling for variation in average category demand, category's size and price differentials. Our empirical findings indicate that doubling the average network influence on a category is associated with an average increase of about 50% in the relative revenue for the least popular 20% of products, and with an average reduction of about 15% in the relative revenue for the most popular 20% of products. We also show that this effect is enhanced by higher assortative mixing and lower clustering in the network, and is greater in categories whose products are more evenly influenced by recommendations. The direction of these results persists over time, across both demand and revenue distributions, and across both daily and weekly demand aggregations. Our work illustrates how the microscopic economic data revealed by online networks can be used to define and answer new kinds of research questions, offers a fresh perspective on the influence of networked IT artifacts on business outcomes, and provides novel empirical evidence about the impact of visible recommendations on the long tail of electronic commerce.
推荐网络与电子商务的长尾
据推测,与电子商务相关的基于同行的推荐导致了需求的再分配,从流行产品或“大片”到不那么流行或“利基”产品,因此电子市场将以需求和收入的“长尾”为特征。我们使用亚马逊网站上200多个不同类别图书的收入分布,以及这些类别产品所在的共同购买推荐网络的详细每日快照,来测试这一猜想。我们使用Google的PageRank中心性度量的一种变体,来衡量一个产品在这个超链接推荐网络中的位置对它的影响程度。然后,我们将网络对每个类别的平均影响与其需求和收入分布的不平等联系起来,使用从类别的洛伦兹曲线得出的基尼系数来量化这种不平等。我们发现,受推荐网络影响较大的品类,即使在控制了平均品类需求、品类规模和价格差异的变化后,其需求和收入分布也显著平坦。我们的实证研究结果表明,对一个类别的平均网络影响力增加一倍,最不受欢迎的20%产品的相对收入平均增加约50%,而最受欢迎的20%产品的相对收入平均减少约15%。我们还表明,这种效应通过网络中更高的分类混合和更低的聚类而增强,并且在产品受推荐影响更均匀的类别中更大。这些结果的方向随着时间的推移而持续存在,包括需求和收入分布,以及每日和每周的需求汇总。我们的工作说明了在线网络揭示的微观经济数据如何用于定义和回答新的研究问题,为网络化IT工件对业务结果的影响提供了新的视角,并提供了关于可见推荐对电子商务长尾影响的新颖经验证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信