Participants Evaluation of Computer-Based Writing Exam Eligibility in High School Using Simple Additive Weighting Method

Wahyu Saptha Negoro, M. Nasution, Agung Ramadhanu, Fhery Agustin, Muhatri Muhatrii, Syahputra Amri
{"title":"Participants Evaluation of Computer-Based Writing Exam Eligibility in High School Using Simple Additive Weighting Method","authors":"Wahyu Saptha Negoro, M. Nasution, Agung Ramadhanu, Fhery Agustin, Muhatri Muhatrii, Syahputra Amri","doi":"10.1109/ICSIMA50015.2021.9526335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Admission of New Students at the Joint Selection of State Universities (SBMPTN) is a selection process for entering State Universities (PTN), where the selection uses a computer-based written exam (UTBK). The test results are the highest scores that become a reference for PTNs and the Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education sets the SBMPTN quota of 40% in each department. This is a big competition for participants to graduate in the desired major. As well as the obstacles faced by participants in the form of not knowing whether the results of the UTBK scores obtained were feasible or not at PTN. The method used in this study is Simple Additive Weighting (SAW), where the calculation provides certain weighting criteria so that each total weight value and result will be a recommendation for SBMPTN participants at SMAN 2 West Sumatra. The data used is divided into 2 groups, namely the IPA and Soshum group data. So that the recommended results are feasible in this study from the science and technology test group as many as 23 participants because they got a total average score of >0.80 and Soshum as many as 7 participants. The data of participants in the study were 40 students, the total recommended eligibility for the SBMPTN pathway was 30 participants and the results of comparison with the actual data contained 2 data processing results that had differences. So it can be explained that there are 38 participants from 40 test data who have the same decision, between the decisions made by the system and the decisions of the SBMPTN selection party, which is 95%. The calculation of this method can be applied in every UTBK selection on the SBMPTN pathway which is the reference for participants to enter higher education.","PeriodicalId":404811,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE 7th International Conference on Smart Instrumentation, Measurement and Applications (ICSIMA)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE 7th International Conference on Smart Instrumentation, Measurement and Applications (ICSIMA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSIMA50015.2021.9526335","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Admission of New Students at the Joint Selection of State Universities (SBMPTN) is a selection process for entering State Universities (PTN), where the selection uses a computer-based written exam (UTBK). The test results are the highest scores that become a reference for PTNs and the Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education sets the SBMPTN quota of 40% in each department. This is a big competition for participants to graduate in the desired major. As well as the obstacles faced by participants in the form of not knowing whether the results of the UTBK scores obtained were feasible or not at PTN. The method used in this study is Simple Additive Weighting (SAW), where the calculation provides certain weighting criteria so that each total weight value and result will be a recommendation for SBMPTN participants at SMAN 2 West Sumatra. The data used is divided into 2 groups, namely the IPA and Soshum group data. So that the recommended results are feasible in this study from the science and technology test group as many as 23 participants because they got a total average score of >0.80 and Soshum as many as 7 participants. The data of participants in the study were 40 students, the total recommended eligibility for the SBMPTN pathway was 30 participants and the results of comparison with the actual data contained 2 data processing results that had differences. So it can be explained that there are 38 participants from 40 test data who have the same decision, between the decisions made by the system and the decisions of the SBMPTN selection party, which is 95%. The calculation of this method can be applied in every UTBK selection on the SBMPTN pathway which is the reference for participants to enter higher education.
用简单加性加权法评价高中学生计算机写作考试资格
州立大学联合选拔(SBMPTN)的新生入学是进入州立大学(PTN)的选拔过程,其中选择使用基于计算机的笔试(UTBK)。测试结果是成为ptn参考的最高分数,研究,技术和高等教育部规定每个部门的SBMPTN配额为40%。这是一场让参与者毕业于理想专业的大型竞赛。以及参与者所面临的障碍,即不知道在PTN获得的UTBK分数结果是否可行。本研究中使用的方法是简单加性加权(SAW),其计算提供了一定的加权标准,以便每个总权重值和结果将被推荐给sman2西苏门答腊的SBMPTN参与者。所使用的数据分为两组,即IPA组和Soshum组数据。因此,推荐的结果在本研究中是可行的,因为科学技术测试组有23名参与者,他们的总平均得分为>.80,而Soshum有7名参与者。本研究参与者数据为40名学生,SBMPTN路径推荐合格人数为30人,与实际数据比较结果包含2个数据处理结果存在差异。因此可以解释,在40个测试数据中,有38个参与者在系统做出的决定和SBMPTN选择方的决定之间有相同的决定,占95%。该方法的计算可应用于SBMPTN路径上的每一次UTBK选择,为参与者进入高等教育提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信