Terminology matching of requirements specification documents and regulations for compliance checking

Ryotaro Nakamura, Yu Negishi, Shinpei Hayashi, M. Saeki
{"title":"Terminology matching of requirements specification documents and regulations for compliance checking","authors":"Ryotaro Nakamura, Yu Negishi, Shinpei Hayashi, M. Saeki","doi":"10.1109/RELAW.2015.7330206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To check the consistency between requirements specification documents and regulations by using a model checking technique, requirements analysts generate inputs to the model checker, i.e., state transition machines from the documents and logical formulas from the regulatory statements to be verified as properties. During these generation processes, to make the logical formulas semantically correspond to the state transition machine, analysts should take terminology matching where they look for the words in the requirements document having the same meaning as the words in the regulatory statements and unify the semantically same words. In this paper, by using case grammar approach, we propose an automated technique to reason the meaning of words in requirements specification documents by means of co-occurrence constraints on words in case frames, and to generate from regulatory statements the logical formulas where the words are unified to the words of the requirements documents. We have a feasibility study of our proposal with two case studies.","PeriodicalId":130029,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE Eighth International Workshop on Requirements Engineering and Law (RELAW)","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE Eighth International Workshop on Requirements Engineering and Law (RELAW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RELAW.2015.7330206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

To check the consistency between requirements specification documents and regulations by using a model checking technique, requirements analysts generate inputs to the model checker, i.e., state transition machines from the documents and logical formulas from the regulatory statements to be verified as properties. During these generation processes, to make the logical formulas semantically correspond to the state transition machine, analysts should take terminology matching where they look for the words in the requirements document having the same meaning as the words in the regulatory statements and unify the semantically same words. In this paper, by using case grammar approach, we propose an automated technique to reason the meaning of words in requirements specification documents by means of co-occurrence constraints on words in case frames, and to generate from regulatory statements the logical formulas where the words are unified to the words of the requirements documents. We have a feasibility study of our proposal with two case studies.
符合性检查的需求、规范文件和法规的术语匹配
为了通过使用模型检查技术来检查需求规范文档和法规之间的一致性,需求分析人员为模型检查器生成输入,即来自文档的状态转换机和来自要作为属性进行验证的法规语句的逻辑公式。在这些生成过程中,为了使逻辑公式在语义上与状态转换机相对应,分析人员应该进行术语匹配,在需求文档中寻找与法规语句中具有相同含义的单词,并统一语义上相同的单词。在本文中,我们采用大小写语法方法,提出了一种自动化技术,通过大小写框架中单词的共现约束来推理需求规范文档中单词的含义,并从规则语句中生成逻辑公式,其中单词与需求文档中的单词统一。我们对我们的建议进行了可行性研究,包括两个案例研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信