Arbitrator’s expectations and motives regarding the expert accountant’s performance in arbitration in the light of role theory

Alessandra Ribas Secco, Ivam Ricardo Peleias, Elionor Jreige Weffort, Denize Grzybovski
{"title":"Arbitrator’s expectations and motives regarding the expert accountant’s performance in arbitration in the light of role theory","authors":"Alessandra Ribas Secco, Ivam Ricardo Peleias, Elionor Jreige Weffort, Denize Grzybovski","doi":"10.1590/1808-057x20221369.en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The paper sought to grasp the arbitrator’s expectations regarding the expert accountant’s performance in the arbitration arena in the light of role theory and the reasons for meeting these expectations or not. The study of arbitrator’s expectations has been poorly explored in the field of forensic accounting. This article helps to fill this gap by presenting expectations and motives that affect the arbitrator’s perception of the expert accountant’s service. The study is relevant because it grasps expectations from the arbitrator’s viewpoint (role transferrer) regarding the expert accountant’s performance (function recipient). Expectations are characterized by abilities and skills that may not be met during role performance due to conflicting or ambiguous reasons, simultaneous occurrence of two or more roles, or lack of clarity about the latter. The research aims to provide means for expert accountants entering arbitration and seek improvement for those already working in this scenario, reducing the gap between the arbitrator’s expectations and expert evidence production. The descriptive research has been designed as a field study and a qualitative approach to data. The research participants were 15 Brazilian arbitrators. Data collection took place through interviews and they were submitted to the content analysis method and the categorical analysis technique. The results indicate that the arbitrator’s expectations are oratory, objectivity, clarity, and sticking to the technical issue, while the reasons are inter-transferrer, inter-role conflict, overload, expert’s partiality, and lack of clarity when the arbitrator transfers the role. The practical contribution lies in providing means for expert accountants entering arbitration and seeking improvement for those already working in this scenario, reducing the gap between the arbitrator’s expectations and expert evidence production.","PeriodicalId":251378,"journal":{"name":"Revista Contabilidade & Finanças","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Contabilidade & Finanças","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x20221369.en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The paper sought to grasp the arbitrator’s expectations regarding the expert accountant’s performance in the arbitration arena in the light of role theory and the reasons for meeting these expectations or not. The study of arbitrator’s expectations has been poorly explored in the field of forensic accounting. This article helps to fill this gap by presenting expectations and motives that affect the arbitrator’s perception of the expert accountant’s service. The study is relevant because it grasps expectations from the arbitrator’s viewpoint (role transferrer) regarding the expert accountant’s performance (function recipient). Expectations are characterized by abilities and skills that may not be met during role performance due to conflicting or ambiguous reasons, simultaneous occurrence of two or more roles, or lack of clarity about the latter. The research aims to provide means for expert accountants entering arbitration and seek improvement for those already working in this scenario, reducing the gap between the arbitrator’s expectations and expert evidence production. The descriptive research has been designed as a field study and a qualitative approach to data. The research participants were 15 Brazilian arbitrators. Data collection took place through interviews and they were submitted to the content analysis method and the categorical analysis technique. The results indicate that the arbitrator’s expectations are oratory, objectivity, clarity, and sticking to the technical issue, while the reasons are inter-transferrer, inter-role conflict, overload, expert’s partiality, and lack of clarity when the arbitrator transfers the role. The practical contribution lies in providing means for expert accountants entering arbitration and seeking improvement for those already working in this scenario, reducing the gap between the arbitrator’s expectations and expert evidence production.
角色理论下仲裁员对专家会计师在仲裁中的表现的期望与动机
本文试图从角色理论的角度把握仲裁员对专家会计师在仲裁领域的表现的期望,以及满足这些期望或不满足这些期望的原因。在法务会计领域,对仲裁员期望的研究很少。本文通过提出影响仲裁者对专家会计师服务的看法的期望和动机来帮助填补这一空白。该研究是相关的,因为它从仲裁者(角色转移者)的角度掌握了对专家会计师绩效(功能接受者)的期望。期望的特点是,由于相互冲突或模棱两可的原因,同时出现两个或两个以上的角色,或对后者缺乏明确的认识,在角色表现中可能无法满足的能力和技能。本研究旨在为进入仲裁的专家会计师提供手段,并为已经在这种情况下工作的专家会计师寻求改进,缩小仲裁员期望与专家证据产生之间的差距。描述性研究被设计为实地研究和数据的定性方法。研究参与者是15名巴西仲裁员。通过访谈的方式收集数据,并采用内容分析法和分类分析法。结果表明,在角色转移过程中,仲裁员的期望表现为雄辩性、客观性、明确性和对技术问题的坚持,而原因表现为角色间转移、角色间冲突、超载、专家偏见和不明确。其实际贡献在于为进入仲裁的专家会计师提供手段,并为已经在这种情况下工作的专家会计师寻求改进,从而缩小仲裁员期望与专家证据产生之间的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信