USTAVNOSUDSKA KONTROLA UPRAVE PUTEM USTAVNE ŽALBE SA OSVRTOM NA PRAVNI SISTEM BOSNE I HERCEGOVINE

Sanja Golijanin
{"title":"USTAVNOSUDSKA KONTROLA UPRAVE PUTEM USTAVNE ŽALBE SA OSVRTOM NA PRAVNI SISTEM BOSNE I HERCEGOVINE","authors":"Sanja Golijanin","doi":"10.46793/gp.1001.003g","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In comparison to many other countries in which all legal documents and/or substantive actions of administrative bodies can be the subject of constitutional complaint, in the law of Bosnia and Herzegovina, only individual legal documents of judicial authority may be the subject of dispute through appellation which embodies general characteristic of the constitutional complaint. Appellation is not permitted against individual documents or actions of other state organs, thus administrative bodies as well. However, control of constitutionality of administrative documents by the Constitutional court is possible indirectly: through appellate questioning of substantive and legal issues of the legally binding administrative-judicial decision which determined legality of final administrative decision. Decision rendered by the court replacing certain administrative decision may also be the subject of appellation, provided that such administrative decision has breached constitutional rights and freedoms. As a rule, should the Constitutional court of BiH, within its procedure initiated with submission of appellation, decide that there has been a breach of constitutional rights and freedoms in the judicial decision which ended the respective administrative dispute, not only administrative-judicial decisions (judgements and decisions) are revoked, but often are individual legal documents of the state and republic/cantonal administrative bodies revoked as well. Likewise, should the substantive document, i.e. administrative action, constitute the breach of constitutional rights and freedoms of citizens and such citizens use all available effective legal remedies against such document or decision, appellation may be submitted directly disputing certain document or actions of state body. Should, in specific case, there be no effective legal remedies available to citizens, appellation may be used to directly dispute administrative actions.","PeriodicalId":399228,"journal":{"name":"Glasnik prava","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Glasnik prava","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46793/gp.1001.003g","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In comparison to many other countries in which all legal documents and/or substantive actions of administrative bodies can be the subject of constitutional complaint, in the law of Bosnia and Herzegovina, only individual legal documents of judicial authority may be the subject of dispute through appellation which embodies general characteristic of the constitutional complaint. Appellation is not permitted against individual documents or actions of other state organs, thus administrative bodies as well. However, control of constitutionality of administrative documents by the Constitutional court is possible indirectly: through appellate questioning of substantive and legal issues of the legally binding administrative-judicial decision which determined legality of final administrative decision. Decision rendered by the court replacing certain administrative decision may also be the subject of appellation, provided that such administrative decision has breached constitutional rights and freedoms. As a rule, should the Constitutional court of BiH, within its procedure initiated with submission of appellation, decide that there has been a breach of constitutional rights and freedoms in the judicial decision which ended the respective administrative dispute, not only administrative-judicial decisions (judgements and decisions) are revoked, but often are individual legal documents of the state and republic/cantonal administrative bodies revoked as well. Likewise, should the substantive document, i.e. administrative action, constitute the breach of constitutional rights and freedoms of citizens and such citizens use all available effective legal remedies against such document or decision, appellation may be submitted directly disputing certain document or actions of state body. Should, in specific case, there be no effective legal remedies available to citizens, appellation may be used to directly dispute administrative actions.
与许多其他国家的所有法律文件和(或)行政机关的实质性行动都可以成为宪法申诉的对象相比,在波斯尼亚-黑塞哥维那的法律中,只有司法当局的个别法律文件可以通过体现宪法申诉的一般特征的名称成为争议的对象。不得对其他国家机关、行政机关的个别文件和行为进行称谓。然而,宪法法院可以间接地控制行政文件的合宪性:通过对具有法律约束力的行政司法决定的实体和法律问题的上诉质疑,从而确定最终行政决定的合法性。取代某些行政决定的法院作出的决定也可以是申诉的对象,只要该行政决定违反了宪法权利和自由。一般来说,如果波黑宪法法院在其提交上诉所启动的程序中裁定结束有关行政争端的司法决定侵犯了宪法权利和自由,不仅行政-司法决定(判决和决定)被撤销,而且国家和共和国/州行政机构的个别法律文件也往往被撤销。同样,如果实质性文件,即行政行为,构成对公民宪法权利和自由的侵犯,而公民对该文件或决定采取一切有效的法律补救措施,则可以直接提出申诉,对国家机关的某些文件或行为提出异议。在具体情况下,公民没有有效的法律补救办法时,可以利用申诉直接对行政行为提出争议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信