Numerical Investigation and Validation of Jet Temperature Effects on Nozzle-Afterbody Drag

Berke Haznedaroglu, Omer Ciftci, S. Cadirci, Serhad Aytac
{"title":"Numerical Investigation and Validation of Jet Temperature Effects on Nozzle-Afterbody Drag","authors":"Berke Haznedaroglu, Omer Ciftci, S. Cadirci, Serhad Aytac","doi":"10.1115/imece2021-69769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In this study, jet temperature effects on afterbody drag in subsonic, transonic and supersonic flow conditions have been investigated for a wide range of nozzle throat total pressure to free-stream static pressure ratio (NPR) at Mach numbers 0.6, 0.9 and 1.2 using CFD. Preliminary CFD simulations are conducted for cold air flow with constant specific heat. Experimental data available in NASA Technical Paper 1766 is utilized for validation purposes thus, the CFD simulations are carried out for the identical geometry and boundary conditions reported in the technical paper. Depending on the Mach number, either pressure-based solver with coupled algebraic multigrid scheme or implicit density-based flow solver with Roe-FDS are used for the simulation of compressible flows to maintain convergence and obtain accurate solutions. Second order upwind schemes are preferred for all simulations and it is shown that convergence problems could be prevented when density based solvers are used at relatively high Mach numbers. For all simulations SST k-ω turbulence model proposed by Menter is selected. Based on a robust and verified CFD approach for cold jet analysis, the average drag coefficients Cd at various NPR values between 1.5 and 7 have been successfully estimated at all Ma with relative errors ranging from 5 to 15 % compared to experimental data. Then, the same numerical approach is adopted to the hot jet analysis. Further comparisons to empirical relations revealed a satisfactory agreement only at Ma = 1.2, but no acceptable match at Ma = 0.6 and 0.9.","PeriodicalId":112698,"journal":{"name":"Volume 10: Fluids Engineering","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 10: Fluids Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2021-69769","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this study, jet temperature effects on afterbody drag in subsonic, transonic and supersonic flow conditions have been investigated for a wide range of nozzle throat total pressure to free-stream static pressure ratio (NPR) at Mach numbers 0.6, 0.9 and 1.2 using CFD. Preliminary CFD simulations are conducted for cold air flow with constant specific heat. Experimental data available in NASA Technical Paper 1766 is utilized for validation purposes thus, the CFD simulations are carried out for the identical geometry and boundary conditions reported in the technical paper. Depending on the Mach number, either pressure-based solver with coupled algebraic multigrid scheme or implicit density-based flow solver with Roe-FDS are used for the simulation of compressible flows to maintain convergence and obtain accurate solutions. Second order upwind schemes are preferred for all simulations and it is shown that convergence problems could be prevented when density based solvers are used at relatively high Mach numbers. For all simulations SST k-ω turbulence model proposed by Menter is selected. Based on a robust and verified CFD approach for cold jet analysis, the average drag coefficients Cd at various NPR values between 1.5 and 7 have been successfully estimated at all Ma with relative errors ranging from 5 to 15 % compared to experimental data. Then, the same numerical approach is adopted to the hot jet analysis. Further comparisons to empirical relations revealed a satisfactory agreement only at Ma = 1.2, but no acceptable match at Ma = 0.6 and 0.9.
射流温度对喷嘴-后体阻力影响的数值研究与验证
在马赫数为0.6、0.9和1.2的大范围喷管喉部总压与自由流静压比(NPR)条件下,利用CFD研究了射流温度对亚音速、跨音速和超声速流动条件下后体阻力的影响。对恒定比热下的冷空气流动进行了初步的CFD模拟。NASA技术文件1766中提供的实验数据被用于验证目的,因此,在技术文件中报告的相同几何和边界条件下进行了CFD模拟。根据马赫数的不同,可采用基于压力的耦合代数多重网格求解器或基于隐式密度的Roe-FDS流动求解器来模拟可压缩流动,以保持收敛性并获得精确的解。二阶迎风格式是所有模拟的首选,并且表明当在相对较高的马赫数下使用基于密度的解算器时可以防止收敛问题。所有模拟均选用Menter提出的SST k-ω湍流模型。基于一种可靠且经过验证的冷射流CFD分析方法,在所有Ma下,成功估算了不同NPR值在1.5 ~ 7之间的平均阻力系数Cd,与实验数据相比,相对误差在5% ~ 15%之间。然后,采用同样的数值方法对热射流进行分析。对经验关系的进一步比较表明,只有在Ma = 1.2时才有令人满意的一致,但在Ma = 0.6和0.9时没有可接受的匹配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信