Why Lethal autonomous weapon systems are unacceptable

V. Simák, M. Gregor, M. Hruboš, Dušan Nemec, J. Hrbček
{"title":"Why Lethal autonomous weapon systems are unacceptable","authors":"V. Simák, M. Gregor, M. Hruboš, Dušan Nemec, J. Hrbček","doi":"10.1109/SAMI.2017.7880334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents an overview of some the issues concerning Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems (LAWS), mostly with respect to the current state-of-the-art in the concerned areas of technology, but also — albeit to a somewhat lesser degree — in a more general context that will, perhaps, not be so easily invalidated by technological progress. When all is considered, the paper attempts to answer the question: \"Why artificial intelligence should not be allowed to make decisions about killing human beings?\" The authors are by no means refusing non-lethal autonomous systems, or remotely controlled (non-autonomous) weapons. They merely point to the fact that \"lethal\" and \"autonomous\" is not an acceptable combination.","PeriodicalId":105599,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE 15th International Symposium on Applied Machine Intelligence and Informatics (SAMI)","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE 15th International Symposium on Applied Machine Intelligence and Informatics (SAMI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SAMI.2017.7880334","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper presents an overview of some the issues concerning Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems (LAWS), mostly with respect to the current state-of-the-art in the concerned areas of technology, but also — albeit to a somewhat lesser degree — in a more general context that will, perhaps, not be so easily invalidated by technological progress. When all is considered, the paper attempts to answer the question: "Why artificial intelligence should not be allowed to make decisions about killing human beings?" The authors are by no means refusing non-lethal autonomous systems, or remotely controlled (non-autonomous) weapons. They merely point to the fact that "lethal" and "autonomous" is not an acceptable combination.
为什么致命的自主武器系统是不可接受的
本文概述了有关致命自主武器系统(LAWS)的一些问题,主要涉及有关技术领域的最新技术,但也-尽管程度较轻-在更一般的背景下,也许不会那么容易因技术进步而失效。考虑到所有因素,这篇论文试图回答这样一个问题:“为什么不应该允许人工智能做出杀死人类的决定?”作者绝不是拒绝非致命的自主系统,或远程控制(非自主)武器。他们只是指出,“致命”和“自主”不是一个可以接受的组合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信