THE EFFECT OF PEER MENTORING MODEL USED TO TEACH PERIPHERAL INTRAVENOUS CATHETER PLACEMENT ON KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS, SELF-CONFIDENCE, SATISFACTION AND FEAR OF NURSING STUDENTS: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Serpil Su, Ayşe Kacaroğlu Vicdan
{"title":"THE EFFECT OF PEER MENTORING MODEL USED TO TEACH PERIPHERAL INTRAVENOUS CATHETER PLACEMENT ON KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS, SELF-CONFIDENCE, SATISFACTION AND FEAR OF NURSING STUDENTS: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL","authors":"Serpil Su, Ayşe Kacaroğlu Vicdan","doi":"10.52831/kjhs.1172830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of peer mentoring model used to teach peripheral intravenous catheter placement on knowledge, skills, self-confidence, satisfaction and symptoms of fear of nursing students. \nMethod: This is a controlled, randomized, parallel group and single center study. The Shapiro-Wilk Test, Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test, Mann-Whitney U Test were used for the analysis of the data. The EtaSquared value was used for the effect value of the data. \nResults: When peripheral intravenous catheter knowledge and skills of students were evaluated, there was no statistical difference between the knowledge and skill mean scores of the students in the peer mentoring model group (n=50) and the students in the traditional teaching model (n=51) (p=0.389). When the scores for satisfaction about peripheral intravenous catheter insertion procedures were analysed, a significant difference was found between the groups with an effect value below the medium level (p=0.048, η2=0.038). When the students' self-confidence scores were evaluated, a significant difference was found the groups with an effect value the medium level (p=0.004, η2=0.078). The students in the control group experienced more often symptom of feeling tense compared to the students in the experimental group (p=0.004). \nConclusion: This study found that the peer mentoring model was as effective as the traditional teaching model in gaining skills of peripheral intravenous catheter placement, and the students' self-confidence and satisfaction were higher.","PeriodicalId":212263,"journal":{"name":"Karya Journal of Health Science","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Karya Journal of Health Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52831/kjhs.1172830","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of peer mentoring model used to teach peripheral intravenous catheter placement on knowledge, skills, self-confidence, satisfaction and symptoms of fear of nursing students. Method: This is a controlled, randomized, parallel group and single center study. The Shapiro-Wilk Test, Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test, Mann-Whitney U Test were used for the analysis of the data. The EtaSquared value was used for the effect value of the data. Results: When peripheral intravenous catheter knowledge and skills of students were evaluated, there was no statistical difference between the knowledge and skill mean scores of the students in the peer mentoring model group (n=50) and the students in the traditional teaching model (n=51) (p=0.389). When the scores for satisfaction about peripheral intravenous catheter insertion procedures were analysed, a significant difference was found between the groups with an effect value below the medium level (p=0.048, η2=0.038). When the students' self-confidence scores were evaluated, a significant difference was found the groups with an effect value the medium level (p=0.004, η2=0.078). The students in the control group experienced more often symptom of feeling tense compared to the students in the experimental group (p=0.004). Conclusion: This study found that the peer mentoring model was as effective as the traditional teaching model in gaining skills of peripheral intravenous catheter placement, and the students' self-confidence and satisfaction were higher.
采用同伴指导模式进行外周静脉置管教学对护生知识、技能、自信、满意度和恐惧的影响:随机对照试验
目的:探讨同伴导师制外周静脉置管教学模式对护生知识、技能、自信、满意度和恐惧症状的影响。方法:采用对照、随机、平行组、单中心研究。采用Shapiro-Wilk检验、Wilcoxon sign Rank检验、Mann-Whitney U检验对数据进行分析。使用EtaSquared值表示数据的效应值。结果:对学生外周静脉导管知识技能进行评估时,同伴辅导模式组学生(n=50)与传统教学模式组学生(n=51)的知识技能均分差异无统计学意义(p=0.389)。两组患者外周静脉置管操作满意度评分差异有统计学意义(p=0.048, η2=0.038)。在对学生的自信心得分进行评估时,两组间的影响值均为中等水平(p=0.004, η2=0.078),差异有统计学意义。对照组学生出现紧张症状的频率高于实验组学生(p=0.004)。结论:本研究发现同伴指导模式与传统教学模式在获取外周静脉置管技能方面效果相当,学生的自信心和满意度更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信