{"title":"Schools of Interpretation Thought and Performance Criticism.","authors":"Ronald J. Pelias","doi":"10.1080/10417948509372640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay examines four distinct approaches to interpretation study contained in basic interpretation textbooks and describes the performance criticism each approach generates. The essay also explores several questions about the implications of adopting a monistic, eclectic, or pluralistic stance in performance criticism.","PeriodicalId":234061,"journal":{"name":"Southern Speech Communication Journal","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Speech Communication Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10417948509372640","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Abstract
This essay examines four distinct approaches to interpretation study contained in basic interpretation textbooks and describes the performance criticism each approach generates. The essay also explores several questions about the implications of adopting a monistic, eclectic, or pluralistic stance in performance criticism.