The 1980s:

Karolyn J. Snyder
{"title":"The 1980s:","authors":"Karolyn J. Snyder","doi":"10.5860/choice.44-2475a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I n the past five years the burgeon ing interest in clinical supervision (CS) on the part of scholars and practitioners has resulted in a pro fusion of books and articles on the subject. Not only are there more CS action labs and workshops available but school districts are also seeking CS consultants in greater numbers. Perceptions in the 1980s about the skill needs of teachers could shape clinical supervision (CS) into little more than a refined teacher inspection technology unless educa tors embrace a comprehensive teacher development system. If we perceive, I think erroneously, that teachers al ready have most of the basic knowl edge and skills necessary to facilitate student mastery of certain compe tencies, then CS (through observa tion and data collection) could be expected to evolve into a sophisti cated inspection system for ensuring appropriate instruction. Most districts today are examining teacher performance closely and set ting tough performance evaluation criteria. Preoccupation with evalua tion forms and methods suggests that many districts will be lured into stringent patterns of \"inspection su pervision\" and thereby lose sight of the emerging development role needs of staff. If, on the other hand, we perceive that most teachers are not yet highly proficient in personalized kinds of in struction, CS could emerge less as an evaluation tool and more as a coach ing system to assist teachers in ac quiring proficiency in facilitation of student mastery of knowledge and skills.","PeriodicalId":408754,"journal":{"name":"Nearly Nuclear","volume":"7 12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nearly Nuclear","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.44-2475a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

I n the past five years the burgeon ing interest in clinical supervision (CS) on the part of scholars and practitioners has resulted in a pro fusion of books and articles on the subject. Not only are there more CS action labs and workshops available but school districts are also seeking CS consultants in greater numbers. Perceptions in the 1980s about the skill needs of teachers could shape clinical supervision (CS) into little more than a refined teacher inspection technology unless educa tors embrace a comprehensive teacher development system. If we perceive, I think erroneously, that teachers al ready have most of the basic knowl edge and skills necessary to facilitate student mastery of certain compe tencies, then CS (through observa tion and data collection) could be expected to evolve into a sophisti cated inspection system for ensuring appropriate instruction. Most districts today are examining teacher performance closely and set ting tough performance evaluation criteria. Preoccupation with evalua tion forms and methods suggests that many districts will be lured into stringent patterns of "inspection su pervision" and thereby lose sight of the emerging development role needs of staff. If, on the other hand, we perceive that most teachers are not yet highly proficient in personalized kinds of in struction, CS could emerge less as an evaluation tool and more as a coach ing system to assist teachers in ac quiring proficiency in facilitation of student mastery of knowledge and skills.
1980年代:
在过去的五年中,学者和从业人员对临床监督(CS)的兴趣激增,导致了有关该主题的书籍和文章的大量涌现。不仅有更多的计算机科学行动实验室和研讨会,而且学区也在寻找更多的计算机科学顾问。20世纪80年代对教师技能需求的看法可能会将临床监督(CS)塑造成一种精炼的教师检查技术,除非教育者接受一个全面的教师发展系统。如果我们认为(我认为这是错误的),教师已经掌握了帮助学生掌握某些技能所需的大部分基本知识和技能,那么CS(通过观察和数据收集)就有望演变成一种复杂的检查系统,以确保适当的教学。如今,大多数学区都在密切检查教师的表现,并制定严格的表现评估标准。过分关注评价形式和方法表明,许多地区将被引诱进入严格的“检查监督”模式,从而忽视工作人员正在出现的发展作用需要。另一方面,如果我们意识到大多数教师在个性化教学方面还不是很精通,那么计算机辅助教学就不太可能成为一种评估工具,而更可能成为一种指导系统,以帮助教师在促进学生掌握知识和技能方面获得熟练程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信