Open Surgical Repair of Retrocaval Ureter Without Excision of Retrocaval Segment: Results of 8 Cases in a Single-Center

F. Kızılay, S. Kalemci, A. Şimşir, B. Semerci
{"title":"Open Surgical Repair of Retrocaval Ureter Without Excision of Retrocaval Segment: Results of 8 Cases in a Single-Center","authors":"F. Kızılay, S. Kalemci, A. Şimşir, B. Semerci","doi":"10.5505/aot.2019.95866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Retrocaval ureter (RU) is a rare congenital anomaly characterized by the passage of the ureter through the posterior of the vena cava. We aimed to present the data of 8 cases treated with open surgical repair without excision of the retrocaval segment. METHODS: Eight patients who were operated with the diagnosis of RU in our clinic between 2005-2018 were included in the study. Demographic data, periand postoperative data of the patients were recorded and evaluated. In addition, imaging modalities were recorded. Preand postoperative values of T1⁄2 values in dynamic scintigraphy were compared. All patients underwent open ureterouretereral anostomosis without excision of the retrocaval segment. SPSS 22.0 was used for statistical analysis and p values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Five patients were male and 3 were female. The mean age was 36.2 years (25-48). The mean operation time was 64 minutes (58-92). Six patients (75%) presented with flank pain. The mean hospitalization duration was 2.32 days. In the postoperative period, all patients underwent computed tomography-urography and dynamic and static renal scintigraphy with nuclear medicine study. There was no statistically significant difference between preoperative and postoperative static scintigraphy values (p = 0.741), but dynamic renal scintigraphy difference was significant (T1⁄2 was 25.7 min. preoperatively and 14.4 min. postoperatively, p = 0.016). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Re-anostomosis performed for the retrocaval ureter without any excision of the retrocaval segment yields successful results with minimal postoperative morbidity and short hospital stay.","PeriodicalId":435847,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oncologica Turcica","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oncologica Turcica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5505/aot.2019.95866","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Retrocaval ureter (RU) is a rare congenital anomaly characterized by the passage of the ureter through the posterior of the vena cava. We aimed to present the data of 8 cases treated with open surgical repair without excision of the retrocaval segment. METHODS: Eight patients who were operated with the diagnosis of RU in our clinic between 2005-2018 were included in the study. Demographic data, periand postoperative data of the patients were recorded and evaluated. In addition, imaging modalities were recorded. Preand postoperative values of T1⁄2 values in dynamic scintigraphy were compared. All patients underwent open ureterouretereral anostomosis without excision of the retrocaval segment. SPSS 22.0 was used for statistical analysis and p values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Five patients were male and 3 were female. The mean age was 36.2 years (25-48). The mean operation time was 64 minutes (58-92). Six patients (75%) presented with flank pain. The mean hospitalization duration was 2.32 days. In the postoperative period, all patients underwent computed tomography-urography and dynamic and static renal scintigraphy with nuclear medicine study. There was no statistically significant difference between preoperative and postoperative static scintigraphy values (p = 0.741), but dynamic renal scintigraphy difference was significant (T1⁄2 was 25.7 min. preoperatively and 14.4 min. postoperatively, p = 0.016). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Re-anostomosis performed for the retrocaval ureter without any excision of the retrocaval segment yields successful results with minimal postoperative morbidity and short hospital stay.
不切除腔静脉后段的切开修复腔静脉后段输尿管:单中心8例的结果
简介:腔静脉后输尿管(RU)是一种罕见的先天性异常,其特征是输尿管通过腔静脉的后部。我们的目的是提供8例不切除腔静脉后段的开放性手术修复的资料。方法:选取2005-2018年在我院行RU诊断手术的8例患者为研究对象。记录并评价患者的人口学资料、术后围手术期资料。此外,记录成像模式。比较动态扫描前后T1 / 2值。所有患者均行开放输尿管输尿管吻合术,不切除腔静脉后段。采用SPSS 22.0进行统计学分析,p值< 0.05为有统计学意义。结果:男性5例,女性3例。平均年龄为36.2岁(25-48岁)。平均手术时间64分钟(58 ~ 92)。6例(75%)患者表现为侧腹疼痛。平均住院时间为2.32天。术后对所有患者行计算机断层尿路造影和动态、静态肾显像并进行核医学研究。术前、术后静态肾显像值差异无统计学意义(p = 0.741),但动态肾显像值差异有统计学意义(术前T1 / 2为25.7 min,术后14.4 min, p = 0.016)。讨论与结论:在不切除腔静脉后段的情况下,对腔静脉后输尿管进行再造口术可获得成功的结果,术后发病率低,住院时间短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信