Analysis of Price Competition in a Slotted Resource Allocation Game

P. Maillé, B. Tuffin
{"title":"Analysis of Price Competition in a Slotted Resource Allocation Game","authors":"P. Maillé, B. Tuffin","doi":"10.1109/INFOCOM.2008.141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pricing telecommunication networks has become a highly regarded topic during the last decade, in order to cope with congestion by controlling demand, or to yield proper incentives for a fair sharing of resources. On the other hand, another important factor has to be brought in: there is a rise of competition between service providers in telecommunication networks such as for instance the Internet, and the impact of this competition has to be carefully analyzed. The present paper pertains to this recent stream of works. We consider a slotted resource allocation game with several providers, each of them having a fixed capacity during each time slot, and a fixed access price. Each provider serves its demand up to its capacity, demand in excess being dropped. Total user demand is therefore split among providers according to Wardrop's principle, depending on price and loss probability. Using the characterization of the resulting equilibrium, we prove, under mild conditions, the existence and uniqueness of a Nash equilibrium in the pricing game between providers. We also show that, remarkably, this equilibrium actually corresponds to the socially optimal situation obtained when both users and providers cooperate to maximize the sum of all utilities, this even if providers have the opportunity to artificially reduce their capacity.","PeriodicalId":447520,"journal":{"name":"IEEE INFOCOM 2008 - The 27th Conference on Computer Communications","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"53","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE INFOCOM 2008 - The 27th Conference on Computer Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INFOCOM.2008.141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 53

Abstract

Pricing telecommunication networks has become a highly regarded topic during the last decade, in order to cope with congestion by controlling demand, or to yield proper incentives for a fair sharing of resources. On the other hand, another important factor has to be brought in: there is a rise of competition between service providers in telecommunication networks such as for instance the Internet, and the impact of this competition has to be carefully analyzed. The present paper pertains to this recent stream of works. We consider a slotted resource allocation game with several providers, each of them having a fixed capacity during each time slot, and a fixed access price. Each provider serves its demand up to its capacity, demand in excess being dropped. Total user demand is therefore split among providers according to Wardrop's principle, depending on price and loss probability. Using the characterization of the resulting equilibrium, we prove, under mild conditions, the existence and uniqueness of a Nash equilibrium in the pricing game between providers. We also show that, remarkably, this equilibrium actually corresponds to the socially optimal situation obtained when both users and providers cooperate to maximize the sum of all utilities, this even if providers have the opportunity to artificially reduce their capacity.
狭缝资源配置博弈中的价格竞争分析
在过去十年中,电信网络的定价已成为一个备受重视的问题,以便通过控制需求来解决拥挤问题,或为公平分享资源提供适当的奖励。另一方面,必须考虑另一个重要因素:电信网络(例如互联网)服务提供商之间的竞争日益激烈,必须仔细分析这种竞争的影响。这篇论文是关于最近的一批作品的。我们考虑一个有几个供应商的时隙资源分配博弈,每个供应商在每个时隙都有固定的容量和固定的访问价格。每个供应商都以其容量满足其需求,多余的需求将被丢弃。因此,根据Wardrop的原则,根据价格和损失概率,总用户需求在供应商之间分配。利用所得均衡的特征,在温和条件下,证明了供应商定价博弈中纳什均衡的存在性和唯一性。我们还表明,值得注意的是,这种均衡实际上对应于当用户和提供者合作以最大化所有效用的总和时所获得的社会最优情况,即使提供者有机会人为地减少他们的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信