Comparative Study on Seismic Performance of Steel Building & Composite Building with CFT & CFST Column

Selvan V
{"title":"Comparative Study on Seismic Performance of Steel Building & Composite Building with CFT & CFST Column","authors":"Selvan V","doi":"10.23880/nnoa-16000225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper a comparative study is done on Steel building & Composite building with CFT, CFT with stiffeners, CFDST Hollow & CFDST column. Seismic Analysis of (B+G+9) building is done in both Equivalent Static method & Response Spectrum method using ETABS software & Optimum Composite column is obtained from Parameter 1 (Steel Ratio, Buckling Load, Plastic Resistance, H/T Ratio), Parameter 2 (Displacement, Story Drift, Base Shear, Overturning Moment, Story Stiffness), Parameter3 (Moment of Inertia, C/S Area, Total Weight, Total Tonnage).","PeriodicalId":299890,"journal":{"name":"Nanomedicine & Nanotechnology Open Access","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nanomedicine & Nanotechnology Open Access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23880/nnoa-16000225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper a comparative study is done on Steel building & Composite building with CFT, CFT with stiffeners, CFDST Hollow & CFDST column. Seismic Analysis of (B+G+9) building is done in both Equivalent Static method & Response Spectrum method using ETABS software & Optimum Composite column is obtained from Parameter 1 (Steel Ratio, Buckling Load, Plastic Resistance, H/T Ratio), Parameter 2 (Displacement, Story Drift, Base Shear, Overturning Moment, Story Stiffness), Parameter3 (Moment of Inertia, C/S Area, Total Weight, Total Tonnage).
钢结构建筑与CFT & CFST柱组合建筑抗震性能比较研究
本文对钢结构建筑与复合结构建筑、加筋钢结构建筑、CFDST空心结构与CFDST柱结构进行了对比研究。采用ETABS软件,采用等效静力法和反应谱法对(B+G+9)建筑进行了地震分析,并从参数1(钢比、屈曲载荷、塑性阻力、H/T比)、参数2(位移、层间位移、基底剪力、倾覆力矩、层间刚度)、参数3(惯性矩、C/S面积、总重、总吨位)中获得最佳组合柱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信