The souls of Europe

G. Buijs
{"title":"The souls of Europe","authors":"G. Buijs","doi":"10.3846/2029-0187.2009.2.126-139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How should Europe deal politically with its legacy as a so‐called “Christian civilization\"? Should this imply an overt reference to God or to the Christian or Judeo‐Christian tradition in European constitutional documents (as was debated when the so‐called “Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe” was tabled)? This debate raised the old “politico‐theological problem”: does a political order need some kind of metaphysical or religious grounding, a “soul”, or can it present itself as a purely rational order, the result of a utilitarian calculus? In this article it is argued that the secular idea of the state as an inherent element in the “Judeo‐Christian tradition”, for a “divine state” usurps a place that is only God's. So, this religious tradition itself calls for a secular state, and this inherent relationship between religion and secularity has become a key element for the interpretation of European civilization, most notably in the idea of a separation of the church and the state. But the very fact that this is a religious idea does imply that the European political order cannot be seen as a purely rational political order without a soul. The idea of a “plural soul” is proposed as a way out of the dilemma.","PeriodicalId":256919,"journal":{"name":"LIMES: Cultural Regionalistics","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LIMES: Cultural Regionalistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3846/2029-0187.2009.2.126-139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How should Europe deal politically with its legacy as a so‐called “Christian civilization"? Should this imply an overt reference to God or to the Christian or Judeo‐Christian tradition in European constitutional documents (as was debated when the so‐called “Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe” was tabled)? This debate raised the old “politico‐theological problem”: does a political order need some kind of metaphysical or religious grounding, a “soul”, or can it present itself as a purely rational order, the result of a utilitarian calculus? In this article it is argued that the secular idea of the state as an inherent element in the “Judeo‐Christian tradition”, for a “divine state” usurps a place that is only God's. So, this religious tradition itself calls for a secular state, and this inherent relationship between religion and secularity has become a key element for the interpretation of European civilization, most notably in the idea of a separation of the church and the state. But the very fact that this is a religious idea does imply that the European political order cannot be seen as a purely rational political order without a soul. The idea of a “plural soul” is proposed as a way out of the dilemma.
欧洲之魂
欧洲应该如何在政治上处理其作为所谓“基督教文明”的遗产?这是否意味着在欧洲宪法文件中公开提及上帝或基督教或犹太教-基督教传统(正如所谓的“建立欧洲宪法条约”被提交时所辩论的那样)?这场辩论提出了一个古老的“政治-神学问题”:一个政治秩序是否需要某种形而上学或宗教基础,一个“灵魂”,或者它是否可以表现为一个纯粹的理性秩序,一个功利主义计算的结果?本文认为,国家的世俗观念是“犹太教-基督教传统”的固有元素,因为“神性国家”篡夺了只属于上帝的地方。因此,这种宗教传统本身要求一个世俗的国家,这种宗教与世俗之间的内在关系已经成为解释欧洲文明的关键因素,最明显的是政教分离的观点。但这是一种宗教观念这一事实确实意味着,欧洲政治秩序不能被视为一种没有灵魂的纯粹理性的政治秩序。“多元灵魂”的概念被提出作为摆脱困境的一种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信