Comparison of the distribution optimal power flow relaxations for unbalanced loads and generations

Amin Bunaiyan, F. Mancilla–David
{"title":"Comparison of the distribution optimal power flow relaxations for unbalanced loads and generations","authors":"Amin Bunaiyan, F. Mancilla–David","doi":"10.1109/NAPS.2017.8107209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a numerical comparison between the second order cone relaxation for single-phase distribution systems and the semidefinite relaxation for the multiphase distribution systems for the optimal power flow problem considering unbalanced load and generation. Towards this end, the IEEE 37-bus test feeder is adapted using four different distribution line models for the various feeder segments and by populating selected nodes with photovoltaic inverters. Results generated by Matlab Software for Disciplined Convex Programming (CVX) suggest that solutions found using the four line models are almost identical for the multiphase algorithm, but losses may be larger using the single-phase algorithm.","PeriodicalId":296428,"journal":{"name":"2017 North American Power Symposium (NAPS)","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 North American Power Symposium (NAPS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NAPS.2017.8107209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents a numerical comparison between the second order cone relaxation for single-phase distribution systems and the semidefinite relaxation for the multiphase distribution systems for the optimal power flow problem considering unbalanced load and generation. Towards this end, the IEEE 37-bus test feeder is adapted using four different distribution line models for the various feeder segments and by populating selected nodes with photovoltaic inverters. Results generated by Matlab Software for Disciplined Convex Programming (CVX) suggest that solutions found using the four line models are almost identical for the multiphase algorithm, but losses may be larger using the single-phase algorithm.
不平衡负荷与世代分配最优潮流松弛的比较
针对考虑不平衡负荷和发电的最优潮流问题,对单相配电系统的二阶锥松弛和多相配电系统的半定松弛进行了数值比较。为此,IEEE 37总线测试馈线采用四种不同的配电线路模型,用于不同的馈线段,并在选定的节点上安装光伏逆变器。Matlab Software for Disciplined Convex Programming (CVX)生成的结果表明,对于多相算法,使用四种线模型找到的解几乎相同,但使用单相算法的损失可能更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信