Franchising and the Extraction of Surplus Value: Excavating the Legal Boundary Between Franchisees and Employees

E. Tucker, Timothy J. Bartkiw
{"title":"Franchising and the Extraction of Surplus Value: Excavating the Legal Boundary Between Franchisees and Employees","authors":"E. Tucker, Timothy J. Bartkiw","doi":"10.5070/lp63361143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Nearly one in ten Canadians in the private sector works in the franchised sector of the economy. For the most part, franchisors operate as rentiers, extracting value from franchisees for the use of their brand. Research has demonstrated that this arrangement puts additional pressure on franchisees to extract surplus value from their employees that tend toward substandard and unlawful working conditions. In this scenario, franchisors benefit from but are only indirectly involved in the extract of surplus value. In some cases, however, the vertical controls exercised by “franchisors” over “franchisees” are so extensive, and the financial contribution of “franchisees” is so limited, that the franchisor becomes involved in directly extracting surplus value from franchisees. We explore this latter phenomenon through an excavation of the history of the legal distinction in Canadian business-format franchising in Canada and detailed studies of two recent Canadian cases in which “ franchisees ” successfully claimed employment status.","PeriodicalId":425370,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and Political Economy","volume":"1989-1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law and Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5070/lp63361143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: Nearly one in ten Canadians in the private sector works in the franchised sector of the economy. For the most part, franchisors operate as rentiers, extracting value from franchisees for the use of their brand. Research has demonstrated that this arrangement puts additional pressure on franchisees to extract surplus value from their employees that tend toward substandard and unlawful working conditions. In this scenario, franchisors benefit from but are only indirectly involved in the extract of surplus value. In some cases, however, the vertical controls exercised by “franchisors” over “franchisees” are so extensive, and the financial contribution of “franchisees” is so limited, that the franchisor becomes involved in directly extracting surplus value from franchisees. We explore this latter phenomenon through an excavation of the history of the legal distinction in Canadian business-format franchising in Canada and detailed studies of two recent Canadian cases in which “ franchisees ” successfully claimed employment status.
特许经营与剩余价值的提取:挖掘特许经营者与员工的法律界限
在私营部门工作的加拿大人中,近十分之一在特许经营部门工作。在大多数情况下,特许经营商以食利者的身份经营,从特许经营商身上榨取其品牌的价值。研究表明,这种安排给特许经营商带来了额外的压力,迫使他们从员工那里榨取剩余价值,而这些员工往往从事不合格和非法的工作条件。在这种情况下,特许人从剩余价值的提取中获益,但只是间接参与。然而,在某些情况下,“特许人”对“被特许人”的纵向控制是如此广泛,而“被特许人”的财务贡献是如此有限,以至于特许人直接参与从被特许人那里榨取剩余价值。我们通过挖掘加拿大商业模式特许经营的法律区别历史,并详细研究加拿大最近两个“特许经营者”成功申请就业身份的案例,来探讨后一种现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信