From addressing to redressing consumption: how the System of Provision approach helps

B. Fine, Kate Bayliss
{"title":"From addressing to redressing consumption: how the System of Provision approach helps","authors":"B. Fine, Kate Bayliss","doi":"10.1332/kdrh7457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Critics of consumption studies contend that it has become conceived as a broad catch-all for too diverse a range of phenomena, forcing these categorically into questionable commonalities around the consumer/consumed without regard to conceptual clarity and distinctions. The System of Provision (SoP) approach can only wrongly be considered as guilty of this fault. Since first devised some 30 years ago to address the study of consumption, its scope has broadened to cover a range of sectors including consumer durables, food, clothing, housing, transport, water and health. But the approach does not apply the idea of consumption to everything willy-nilly, being designed to address the concern that the drivers of consumption are irreducibly contextual. In contrast to other consumption perspectives, for the SoP approach, the complexity and specificity of what is being consumed is the starting point for its analytical framework. Informed by insights from across the social sciences, the approach draws on a theoretically informed but inductive framework, open to different research methods. The approach incorporates the structures, relations, processes and agencies underpinning the chain of activities linking production to consumption, inevitably engaging with features of contemporary capitalism, such as neoliberalism underpinned by financialisation. With attention to material cultures, the SoP approach differentiates meanings of consumption across diverse applications. While engaging grand narratives, the SoP approach is attuned to the contextual specificity of what is consumed, where, when and by whom. Thus, the approach has wide-ranging applicability precisely because it incorporates differentiation in the social construction and construal of the consumed and the consumer.","PeriodicalId":443072,"journal":{"name":"Consumption and Society","volume":"13 11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Consumption and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/kdrh7457","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Critics of consumption studies contend that it has become conceived as a broad catch-all for too diverse a range of phenomena, forcing these categorically into questionable commonalities around the consumer/consumed without regard to conceptual clarity and distinctions. The System of Provision (SoP) approach can only wrongly be considered as guilty of this fault. Since first devised some 30 years ago to address the study of consumption, its scope has broadened to cover a range of sectors including consumer durables, food, clothing, housing, transport, water and health. But the approach does not apply the idea of consumption to everything willy-nilly, being designed to address the concern that the drivers of consumption are irreducibly contextual. In contrast to other consumption perspectives, for the SoP approach, the complexity and specificity of what is being consumed is the starting point for its analytical framework. Informed by insights from across the social sciences, the approach draws on a theoretically informed but inductive framework, open to different research methods. The approach incorporates the structures, relations, processes and agencies underpinning the chain of activities linking production to consumption, inevitably engaging with features of contemporary capitalism, such as neoliberalism underpinned by financialisation. With attention to material cultures, the SoP approach differentiates meanings of consumption across diverse applications. While engaging grand narratives, the SoP approach is attuned to the contextual specificity of what is consumed, where, when and by whom. Thus, the approach has wide-ranging applicability precisely because it incorporates differentiation in the social construction and construal of the consumed and the consumer.
从解决到纠正消费:供应制度方法如何起作用
消费研究的批评者认为,它已经被认为是一个广泛的包罗万象,涵盖了各种各样的现象,迫使这些现象在不考虑概念清晰度和区别的情况下,在消费者/被消费者周围形成可疑的共性。规定制度(SoP)方法只能被错误地认为犯了这一错误。自大约30年前首次设计用于消费研究以来,其范围已扩大到涵盖一系列部门,包括耐用消费品、食品、服装、住房、运输、水和卫生。但这种方法并没有把消费的概念应用到任何事情上,而是旨在解决这样一种担忧,即消费的驱动因素是不可简化的背景因素。与其他消费视角相比,对于SoP方法,所消费内容的复杂性和特殊性是其分析框架的起点。该方法借鉴了来自整个社会科学的见解,借鉴了一个理论上知情但归纳的框架,对不同的研究方法开放。这种方法结合了结构、关系、过程和机构,支撑着将生产与消费联系起来的活动链,不可避免地与当代资本主义的特征相结合,比如以金融化为基础的新自由主义。注意到物质文化,SoP方法在不同的应用程序中区分消费的含义。在参与宏大叙事的同时,SoP方法与消费的内容、地点、时间和由谁消费的上下文特异性相协调。因此,该方法具有广泛的适用性,正是因为它在社会建构和对消费者和消费者的解释中纳入了差异化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信