How Does Organizational Culture Influence the Adoption of Research Evidence by Management Practitioners?

Muma Business Review Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI:10.28945/4834
Juan C Cruz, Justin R. Blaney
{"title":"How Does Organizational Culture Influence the Adoption of Research Evidence by Management Practitioners?","authors":"Juan C Cruz, Justin R. Blaney","doi":"10.28945/4834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using the best available evidence from multiple sources can lead to more effective management practice. However, management practitioners often make decisions based on limited evidence, mostly from personal experience and judgment. Values, beliefs, and practices may conflict with a manager’s ability to use research evidence in practice. \n\nThis systematic review suggests that an integration of the diffusion of innovations (Rogers, 1995) and planned behavior (Ajzen, 1991) theories may be used to explain the influence of values, beliefs, and practices on the adoption of research evidence by management practitioners. These cultural influence factors may be conceptualized as moderating the effects of innovation diffusion efforts on research evidence adoption behavior. \n\nViewing evidence-based management (EBMgt) as an innovation, organizational managers may employ innovation diffusion strategies to influence values, beliefs, and practices conducive to using research evidence in management practice. This review presents recommendations for both practitioners and scholars to facilitate EBMgt. Practitioners can promote a culture that enables evidence-based practice, use tact when presenting evidence to a skeptical audience, and form partnerships with scholars. Leaders can promote the use of evidence in their organizations, provide evidence-based practice tools and training, and use human resource practices to ensure key positions are proficient in research skills. Scholars can publish more practitioner-friendly evidence and teach business and management students research skills.","PeriodicalId":234535,"journal":{"name":"Muma Business Review","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Muma Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28945/4834","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Using the best available evidence from multiple sources can lead to more effective management practice. However, management practitioners often make decisions based on limited evidence, mostly from personal experience and judgment. Values, beliefs, and practices may conflict with a manager’s ability to use research evidence in practice. This systematic review suggests that an integration of the diffusion of innovations (Rogers, 1995) and planned behavior (Ajzen, 1991) theories may be used to explain the influence of values, beliefs, and practices on the adoption of research evidence by management practitioners. These cultural influence factors may be conceptualized as moderating the effects of innovation diffusion efforts on research evidence adoption behavior. Viewing evidence-based management (EBMgt) as an innovation, organizational managers may employ innovation diffusion strategies to influence values, beliefs, and practices conducive to using research evidence in management practice. This review presents recommendations for both practitioners and scholars to facilitate EBMgt. Practitioners can promote a culture that enables evidence-based practice, use tact when presenting evidence to a skeptical audience, and form partnerships with scholars. Leaders can promote the use of evidence in their organizations, provide evidence-based practice tools and training, and use human resource practices to ensure key positions are proficient in research skills. Scholars can publish more practitioner-friendly evidence and teach business and management students research skills.
组织文化如何影响管理从业者对研究证据的采纳?
使用来自多个来源的最佳可用证据可以导致更有效的管理实践。然而,管理从业者经常根据有限的证据做出决策,主要来自个人经验和判断。价值观、信念和实践可能与管理者在实践中使用研究证据的能力相冲突。这一系统综述表明,创新扩散理论(Rogers, 1995)和计划行为理论(Ajzen, 1991)的整合可以用来解释价值观、信念和实践对管理实践者采用研究证据的影响。这些文化影响因素可以被概念化为调节创新扩散努力对研究证据采纳行为的影响。将循证管理(EBMgt)视为一种创新,组织管理者可以采用创新扩散策略来影响有利于在管理实践中使用研究证据的价值观、信念和实践。本综述为从业者和学者提供了促进EBMgt的建议。从业者可以促进一种以证据为基础的实践文化,在向持怀疑态度的听众展示证据时使用机智,并与学者建立伙伴关系。领导者可以在他们的组织中促进证据的使用,提供基于证据的实践工具和培训,并使用人力资源实践来确保关键职位精通研究技能。学者们可以发表更多有利于从业者的证据,并教授商业和管理专业的学生研究技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信