Data-Driven Model for the Drilling Accidents Prediction

Ksenia Antipova, Nikita Klyuchnikov, A. Zaytsev, E. Gurina, Evgenia Romanenkova, D. Koroteev
{"title":"Data-Driven Model for the Drilling Accidents Prediction","authors":"Ksenia Antipova, Nikita Klyuchnikov, A. Zaytsev, E. Gurina, Evgenia Romanenkova, D. Koroteev","doi":"10.2118/195888-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Majority of the accidents while drilling have a number of premonitory symptoms notable during continuous drilling support. Experts can usually recognize such symptoms, however, we are not aware of any system that can do this job automatically. We have developed a Machine learning algorithm which allows detecting anomalies using the drilling support data (drilling telemetry). The algorithm automatically extracts patterns of premonitory symptoms and then recognizes them during drilling.\n The machine learning model is based on Gradient Boosting decision trees. The model analyzes real time drilling parameters within a sliding 4-hour window. For each measurement, the model calculates the probability of an accident and warns about anomaly of particular type, if the probability exceeds the selected threshold.\n Our training sample comes from 20+ oilfields and consists of sections related to 80+ accidents of the following types: stuck pipe, mud loss, gas-oil-water show, washout of pipe string, failure of drilling tool, packing formation, that occurred while drilling, trip-in, trip-out, reaming.\n We have designed the prediction model to work during drilling new wells and to distinguish the normal drilling process from the faulty one. One can configure the anomaly threshold to balance amount of false alarms and the number of missed accidents.\n To evaluate quality of the model we measure such data science metrics as ROC AUC score and confusion matrices. While testing model can identify 24 accident from 30 with high confidence, whereas for the others there is still a room for improvement. Our findings suggest that including more accidents of underrepresented types will improve quality. Other data science metrics also support aptitude of the model. Finally, having data from multiple heterogeneous oilfields, we expect that the model will generalize well to new ones.\n This paper presents a good practice of development and implementation of a data-driven model for automatic supervision of continuous drilling. In particular, the model described in the paper will assist specialists with drilling accidents prediction, optimize their work with data and reduce the nonproductive time associated with the accidents by up to 20%.","PeriodicalId":325107,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, September 30, 2019","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, September 30, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/195888-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Majority of the accidents while drilling have a number of premonitory symptoms notable during continuous drilling support. Experts can usually recognize such symptoms, however, we are not aware of any system that can do this job automatically. We have developed a Machine learning algorithm which allows detecting anomalies using the drilling support data (drilling telemetry). The algorithm automatically extracts patterns of premonitory symptoms and then recognizes them during drilling. The machine learning model is based on Gradient Boosting decision trees. The model analyzes real time drilling parameters within a sliding 4-hour window. For each measurement, the model calculates the probability of an accident and warns about anomaly of particular type, if the probability exceeds the selected threshold. Our training sample comes from 20+ oilfields and consists of sections related to 80+ accidents of the following types: stuck pipe, mud loss, gas-oil-water show, washout of pipe string, failure of drilling tool, packing formation, that occurred while drilling, trip-in, trip-out, reaming. We have designed the prediction model to work during drilling new wells and to distinguish the normal drilling process from the faulty one. One can configure the anomaly threshold to balance amount of false alarms and the number of missed accidents. To evaluate quality of the model we measure such data science metrics as ROC AUC score and confusion matrices. While testing model can identify 24 accident from 30 with high confidence, whereas for the others there is still a room for improvement. Our findings suggest that including more accidents of underrepresented types will improve quality. Other data science metrics also support aptitude of the model. Finally, having data from multiple heterogeneous oilfields, we expect that the model will generalize well to new ones. This paper presents a good practice of development and implementation of a data-driven model for automatic supervision of continuous drilling. In particular, the model described in the paper will assist specialists with drilling accidents prediction, optimize their work with data and reduce the nonproductive time associated with the accidents by up to 20%.
钻井事故预测的数据驱动模型
大多数钻井事故在连续钻井支撑期间都有一些明显的先兆症状。专家通常可以识别这些症状,然而,我们不知道有任何系统可以自动完成这项工作。我们开发了一种机器学习算法,可以使用钻井支撑数据(钻井遥测)检测异常。该算法自动提取先兆症状的模式,然后在钻孔过程中识别它们。机器学习模型是基于梯度增强决策树的。该模型在4小时的滑动窗口内分析实时钻井参数。对于每次测量,该模型计算事故的概率,并在概率超过所选阈值时警告特定类型的异常。我们的训练样本来自20多个油田,包括与以下类型的80多个事故相关的部分:卡钻、泥浆漏失、油气水显示、管柱冲蚀、钻井工具失效、充填地层、钻井过程中发生的事故、起下钻、起下钻、扩眼。我们设计的预测模型是为了在新井钻井过程中工作,并区分正常钻井过程和故障钻井过程。可以配置异常阈值来平衡假警报的数量和错过的事故的数量。为了评估模型的质量,我们测量了ROC AUC分数和混淆矩阵等数据科学指标。而测试模型可以从30起事故中识别出24起,置信度较高,而其他事故仍有改进的空间。我们的研究结果表明,纳入更多代表性不足的事故类型将提高质量。其他数据科学指标也支持模型的能力。最后,由于有了多个非均质油田的数据,我们期望该模型能很好地推广到新的油田。本文介绍了一种开发和实现连续钻井自动监控数据驱动模型的良好实践。特别是,本文中描述的模型将帮助专家进行钻井事故预测,优化他们的数据工作,并将与事故相关的非生产时间减少高达20%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信