Clawback: A Comparative Analysis

Michael Shekari
{"title":"Clawback: A Comparative Analysis","authors":"Michael Shekari","doi":"10.5040/9781509932351.ch-003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SSAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS (SMS) are indisputably useful to organizations that implement them correctly in their operations. The benefits that SMS bring to organizations include reduced incident and fatality frequencies, and reduced severity of injuries, illnesses and property damage from unfavorable events. Over time, governmental, industrial and international bodies have published varying standards and guidelines for the development and implementation of SMS. These bodies include International Organization for Standardization (ISO), ANSI, International Labor Organization (ILO) and U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). The author’s objective was to conduct a comparative analysis of SMS standards and accompanying guidance provided by ANSI, ISO, ILO and FAA sources, and to demonstrate the need for global harmonization of safety management standards.","PeriodicalId":172417,"journal":{"name":"Clawback Law in the Context of Succession","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clawback Law in the Context of Succession","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509932351.ch-003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

SSAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS (SMS) are indisputably useful to organizations that implement them correctly in their operations. The benefits that SMS bring to organizations include reduced incident and fatality frequencies, and reduced severity of injuries, illnesses and property damage from unfavorable events. Over time, governmental, industrial and international bodies have published varying standards and guidelines for the development and implementation of SMS. These bodies include International Organization for Standardization (ISO), ANSI, International Labor Organization (ILO) and U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). The author’s objective was to conduct a comparative analysis of SMS standards and accompanying guidance provided by ANSI, ISO, ILO and FAA sources, and to demonstrate the need for global harmonization of safety management standards.
追回:一个比较分析
安全管理体系(SMS)对于在其运作中正确实施的组织无疑是有用的。SMS给组织带来的好处包括减少事故和死亡频率,降低不利事件造成的伤害、疾病和财产损失的严重程度。随着时间的推移,政府、行业和国际机构为SMS的发展和实施发布了不同的标准和指导方针。这些机构包括国际标准化组织(ISO)、美国国家标准协会(ANSI)、国际劳工组织(ILO)和美国联邦航空管理局(FAA)。作者的目的是对美国国家标准协会、国际标准化组织、国际劳工组织和美国联邦航空局提供的SMS标准和随附指南进行比较分析,并证明全球统一安全管理标准的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信