Education NGOs in Makhanda, South Africa: A Zero Sum of Philanthropy and Survival

S. Nomsenge
{"title":"Education NGOs in Makhanda, South Africa: A Zero Sum of Philanthropy and Survival","authors":"S. Nomsenge","doi":"10.25159/0304-615X/4895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Thought and commentary surrounding the upsurge of non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and their involvement in the design and implementation of development in the Global South are accompanied by an unrelenting set of contradictions and self-replicating inconsistencies. These are often embedded in the sector’s nomenclature, ideological underpinnings, intent and impact. Opposing bands of scholarship have sustained these tensions by securing NGOs both within the ambit of developmental thought and practice and also within the criticisms waged against western domination and its splinter models of modernity. In an attempt to extend these prevailing annotations, this paper holds the idealisation of NGOs up to scrutinous reflection within the context of Makhanda’s inequitable educational landscape by proposing that, in order to balance organisational uncertainties with the socio-economic urgencies upon which they trade, NGOs sustain several and, at times, competing affiliations all of which are central to organisational preservation and legitimacy. The tactical means by which organisations preserve these allegiances often deputise socio-economic and educational overhaul in favour of survival. Therefore, this article lays out the ways in which organisational urgencies intersect with contextually specific needs of reform in what becomes a zero sum of philanthropy and survival; this to the extent that, in large part, NGO interventions often serve to moderate, rather than uproot, the set of socio-economic features for which non-state intervention continues to be hailed and hallowed.","PeriodicalId":253851,"journal":{"name":"Africanus: Journal of Development Studies","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Africanus: Journal of Development Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25159/0304-615X/4895","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Thought and commentary surrounding the upsurge of non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and their involvement in the design and implementation of development in the Global South are accompanied by an unrelenting set of contradictions and self-replicating inconsistencies. These are often embedded in the sector’s nomenclature, ideological underpinnings, intent and impact. Opposing bands of scholarship have sustained these tensions by securing NGOs both within the ambit of developmental thought and practice and also within the criticisms waged against western domination and its splinter models of modernity. In an attempt to extend these prevailing annotations, this paper holds the idealisation of NGOs up to scrutinous reflection within the context of Makhanda’s inequitable educational landscape by proposing that, in order to balance organisational uncertainties with the socio-economic urgencies upon which they trade, NGOs sustain several and, at times, competing affiliations all of which are central to organisational preservation and legitimacy. The tactical means by which organisations preserve these allegiances often deputise socio-economic and educational overhaul in favour of survival. Therefore, this article lays out the ways in which organisational urgencies intersect with contextually specific needs of reform in what becomes a zero sum of philanthropy and survival; this to the extent that, in large part, NGO interventions often serve to moderate, rather than uproot, the set of socio-economic features for which non-state intervention continues to be hailed and hallowed.
南非马卡达的教育非政府组织:慈善与生存的零和博弈
围绕非政府组织(ngo)的兴起及其参与全球南方发展的设计和实施的思想和评论,伴随着一系列无情的矛盾和自我复制的不一致。这些通常都植根于该行业的术语、意识形态基础、意图和影响中。相反的学术团体通过在发展思想和实践的范围内以及在对西方统治及其现代性分裂模式的批评中保护非政府组织来维持这种紧张关系。为了扩展这些普遍的注释,本文提出,为了平衡组织的不确定性与他们交易的社会经济紧迫性,非政府组织维持了几个,有时,竞争的从属关系,所有这些都是组织保存和合法性的核心,因此,在Makhanda不公平的教育景观的背景下,将非政府组织的理想化进行了仔细的反思。组织维持这些忠诚的战术手段,往往代表了有利于生存的社会经济和教育改革。因此,本文列出了组织紧迫性与特定背景下的改革需求相交的方式,这将成为慈善和生存的零和;在某种程度上,非政府组织的干预在很大程度上往往起到缓和作用,而不是根除一系列社会经济特征,而非国家干预正是因为这些特征而继续受到欢迎和推崇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信