Developments of Legislative Impact Analysis in France: with reference to “Youth Impact Clause”

C. Kwon
{"title":"Developments of Legislative Impact Analysis in France: with reference to “Youth Impact Clause”","authors":"C. Kwon","doi":"10.21592/eucj.2022.40.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present paper attempts to deal with the effects of a given legislation in practical as well as academic perspectives, commonly called as legislative impact analysis, or legislative assessment as in case of pilot works in Korea. Yet the law and practice in this particular area differs from nation to nation, as the case of France exemplifies in this article. \nIt is to be noted that various works on the works relating to the legislative impacts were largely incorporated in an act of the National Assembly in March 2021. That is the Framework Act on Administration which targets the current laws and regulations if necessary to improve the legal system in the administrative field, obviously including the subject matter. On the other hand, France has been conducting legislative evaluation in a reserved manner by stipulating the subject in a broad way, that is in the revised constitution in 2008. \nThus the writer proposes in the present paper to focus on the following two points : First, considering French legislation, legislative procedures, and the relationship between the government and the National Assembly, attempts were made to pinpoint the characteristics and meaning of the impact analysis system and the possible significance. The French impact analysis is limited to the government-submitted legislation. \nTherefore it is characterized by the fact that it is prepared directly by the relevant department of the Government that submitted the bill. Criticism has always been targeted for lack of fairness. However, the impact analysis system should be understood not only in the form of government but also in the context of legal system and legislative procedures. In other words, horizontal comparison of the two systems, France and Korea for that matter, is difficult because it has a structural difference from the post-legislative impact analysis, as specified in the Framework Act on Administration in case of Korea. \nSecond, among the points raised in the discussions on the French impact analysis, frequently pointed areas concern the so-called “Youth Impact Clause” introduced in 2016. In addition to the existing impact analysis method, special attentions were given to young people, and to the basis of the legislative analysis. At the beginning of the implementation of the Youth Impact Assessment System, the Ministry of Youth Affairs did not put forward active an opinion as expected. Above all, the issue was preempted rather by the general observation, such as “today’s youth-future generation” than the specific and technical points in legislation.","PeriodicalId":232789,"journal":{"name":"European Constitutional Law Association","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Constitutional Law Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21592/eucj.2022.40.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present paper attempts to deal with the effects of a given legislation in practical as well as academic perspectives, commonly called as legislative impact analysis, or legislative assessment as in case of pilot works in Korea. Yet the law and practice in this particular area differs from nation to nation, as the case of France exemplifies in this article. It is to be noted that various works on the works relating to the legislative impacts were largely incorporated in an act of the National Assembly in March 2021. That is the Framework Act on Administration which targets the current laws and regulations if necessary to improve the legal system in the administrative field, obviously including the subject matter. On the other hand, France has been conducting legislative evaluation in a reserved manner by stipulating the subject in a broad way, that is in the revised constitution in 2008. Thus the writer proposes in the present paper to focus on the following two points : First, considering French legislation, legislative procedures, and the relationship between the government and the National Assembly, attempts were made to pinpoint the characteristics and meaning of the impact analysis system and the possible significance. The French impact analysis is limited to the government-submitted legislation. Therefore it is characterized by the fact that it is prepared directly by the relevant department of the Government that submitted the bill. Criticism has always been targeted for lack of fairness. However, the impact analysis system should be understood not only in the form of government but also in the context of legal system and legislative procedures. In other words, horizontal comparison of the two systems, France and Korea for that matter, is difficult because it has a structural difference from the post-legislative impact analysis, as specified in the Framework Act on Administration in case of Korea. Second, among the points raised in the discussions on the French impact analysis, frequently pointed areas concern the so-called “Youth Impact Clause” introduced in 2016. In addition to the existing impact analysis method, special attentions were given to young people, and to the basis of the legislative analysis. At the beginning of the implementation of the Youth Impact Assessment System, the Ministry of Youth Affairs did not put forward active an opinion as expected. Above all, the issue was preempted rather by the general observation, such as “today’s youth-future generation” than the specific and technical points in legislation.
法国立法影响分析的发展:以“青年影响条款”为例
本文试图从实践和学术的角度探讨某一立法的影响,通常称为立法影响分析,或立法评估,如韩国试点工作的情况。然而,这一特定领域的法律和实践因国而异,本文将以法国为例。应该指出的是,与立法影响有关的各种工作主要被纳入2021年3月国民议会的一项法案。这就是《行政框架法》,它针对现行法律法规,如有必要,完善行政领域的法律制度,显然包括标的物。另一方面,法国在2008年修改的宪法中,以宽泛的方式规定了主体,以保留的方式进行立法评价。因此,笔者在本文中提出了以下两点:首先,结合法国的立法、立法程序以及政府与国民议会的关系,试图明确影响分析系统的特点和意义以及可能的意义。法国的影响分析仅限于政府提交的立法。因此,它的特点是,它是由提交法案的政府有关部门直接编制的。批评总是以缺乏公平为目标。但是,对影响分析制度的理解不仅要放在政府的形式中,而且要放在法律制度和立法程序的语境中。也就是说,很难对法国和韩国这两种制度进行横向比较,因为这与韩国的《行政基本法》所规定的立法后影响分析存在结构性差异。其次,在关于法国影响分析的讨论中提出的观点中,经常提到的领域涉及2016年推出的所谓“青年影响条款”。除了现有的影响分析方法外,还特别关注了年轻人,以及立法分析的基础。在青年影响评估制度实施之初,青年事务部并没有像预期的那样积极提出意见。最重要的是,这个问题是由一般的观察,例如“今天的青年-未来的一代”,而不是立法中的具体和技术问题来解决的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信