Synergistic Effect between Surfactant and Nanoparticles on the Stability of Methane Foam in EOR Processes

C. Qian, A. Telmadarreie, M. Dong, S. Bryant
{"title":"Synergistic Effect between Surfactant and Nanoparticles on the Stability of Methane Foam in EOR Processes","authors":"C. Qian, A. Telmadarreie, M. Dong, S. Bryant","doi":"10.2118/195310-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The major challenge in enhanced oil recovery (EOR) by gas injection is poor volumetric sweep efficiency, mainly due to the high gas mobility and reservoir heterogeneity. Injecting gas as a foam increases sweep efficiency, but maintaining foam stability within the reservoir remains a challenge. This research evaluates the synergistic interaction of one type of nanoparticle and a surfactant to increase foam stability, using the concentration ratio of the two components to tune the affinity of the nanoparticle for the gas/liquid interface. We test the capability of the synergistic two-component system to stabilize methane foam and compare it with foam stabilized by surfactants only. A key distinction is the foam stability upon contact with oil, and we explain the observations in static and dynamic conditions.\n Foam stability was measured both in static (foam height) and dynamic (flow through porous media) conditions. In the static test, foam is generated by the shaking method, and foam texture (bubble size and shape) and the decay of foam height with time are indicators of foam stability. To test static stability in presence of oil, heavy oil is injected into the foam-liquid interface. In dynamic test, foam is pre-generated before flowing at elevated pressures into sandpacks containing various oil saturations. Normalized pressure gradient, and apparent viscosity are the indicators of foam stability and effectiveness for improving oil recovery.\n The extent to which nanoparticles are covered with surfactant governs the foam stability both in static and dynamic conditions. Static foam is stable in the presence of oil only if the nanoparticles are partially covered by the surfactant. In the dynamic test, foam stabilized with the only surfactant collapses in the porous media when oil is present. Nanoparticles alone could not generate foam regardless of the presence of oil, but foam stabilized with nanoparticles partially covered by surfactant is stable in the presence of both residual and initial oil. In both static and dynamic conditions, nanoparticles completely covered with a bilayer of surfactant do not stabilize foam in the presence of oil. Partially covered nanoparticles foam also demonstrated salt tolerance in both static and dynamic test. Thus at appropriate surface coverage, the combination of nanoparticles and surfactant is more effective than either stabilizer alone.\n The result shows that surfactant and nanoparticles interaction is important in foam stability in the porous media with oil. In particular, this interaction is synergistic at certain coverage. This type of synergy can provide much more robust mobility control for EOR processes involving gas injection.","PeriodicalId":425264,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, April 24, 2019","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, April 24, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/195310-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The major challenge in enhanced oil recovery (EOR) by gas injection is poor volumetric sweep efficiency, mainly due to the high gas mobility and reservoir heterogeneity. Injecting gas as a foam increases sweep efficiency, but maintaining foam stability within the reservoir remains a challenge. This research evaluates the synergistic interaction of one type of nanoparticle and a surfactant to increase foam stability, using the concentration ratio of the two components to tune the affinity of the nanoparticle for the gas/liquid interface. We test the capability of the synergistic two-component system to stabilize methane foam and compare it with foam stabilized by surfactants only. A key distinction is the foam stability upon contact with oil, and we explain the observations in static and dynamic conditions. Foam stability was measured both in static (foam height) and dynamic (flow through porous media) conditions. In the static test, foam is generated by the shaking method, and foam texture (bubble size and shape) and the decay of foam height with time are indicators of foam stability. To test static stability in presence of oil, heavy oil is injected into the foam-liquid interface. In dynamic test, foam is pre-generated before flowing at elevated pressures into sandpacks containing various oil saturations. Normalized pressure gradient, and apparent viscosity are the indicators of foam stability and effectiveness for improving oil recovery. The extent to which nanoparticles are covered with surfactant governs the foam stability both in static and dynamic conditions. Static foam is stable in the presence of oil only if the nanoparticles are partially covered by the surfactant. In the dynamic test, foam stabilized with the only surfactant collapses in the porous media when oil is present. Nanoparticles alone could not generate foam regardless of the presence of oil, but foam stabilized with nanoparticles partially covered by surfactant is stable in the presence of both residual and initial oil. In both static and dynamic conditions, nanoparticles completely covered with a bilayer of surfactant do not stabilize foam in the presence of oil. Partially covered nanoparticles foam also demonstrated salt tolerance in both static and dynamic test. Thus at appropriate surface coverage, the combination of nanoparticles and surfactant is more effective than either stabilizer alone. The result shows that surfactant and nanoparticles interaction is important in foam stability in the porous media with oil. In particular, this interaction is synergistic at certain coverage. This type of synergy can provide much more robust mobility control for EOR processes involving gas injection.
表面活性剂和纳米颗粒对提高采收率过程中甲烷泡沫稳定性的协同效应
注气提高采收率(EOR)的主要挑战是体积波及效率低,这主要是由于气的高流动性和储层的非均质性。以泡沫形式注入气体可以提高波及效率,但保持储层内泡沫的稳定性仍然是一个挑战。本研究评估了一种纳米颗粒与表面活性剂的协同作用,利用两种成分的浓度比来调节纳米颗粒对气/液界面的亲和力,从而提高泡沫稳定性。我们测试了协同双组分体系稳定甲烷泡沫的能力,并将其与仅由表面活性剂稳定的泡沫进行了比较。一个关键的区别是泡沫与油接触后的稳定性,我们解释在静态和动态条件下的观察。在静态(泡沫高度)和动态(通过多孔介质的流动)条件下测量泡沫稳定性。在静态试验中,泡沫是通过震动法产生的,泡沫的质地(气泡大小和形状)和泡沫高度随时间的衰减是泡沫稳定性的指标。为了测试有油存在时的静态稳定性,将稠油注入泡沫-液体界面。在动态测试中,泡沫是预先产生的,然后在高压下流入含有不同含油饱和度的沙包中。归一化压力梯度和表观粘度是泡沫稳定性和提高采收率效果的指标。表面活性剂覆盖纳米颗粒的程度决定了泡沫在静态和动态条件下的稳定性。只有当纳米颗粒部分被表面活性剂覆盖时,静态泡沫才会在油的存在下保持稳定。在动态测试中,当有油存在时,用唯一的表面活性剂稳定的泡沫在多孔介质中崩溃。单独的纳米颗粒在油的存在下都不能产生泡沫,而表面活性剂部分覆盖的纳米颗粒稳定的泡沫在残余油和初始油的存在下都是稳定的。在静态和动态条件下,完全覆盖着双层表面活性剂的纳米颗粒在存在油的情况下都不能稳定泡沫。在静态和动态测试中,部分覆盖的纳米颗粒泡沫也表现出耐盐性。因此,在适当的表面覆盖下,纳米颗粒和表面活性剂的组合比单独使用任何一种稳定剂都更有效。结果表明,表面活性剂与纳米颗粒的相互作用对含油多孔介质的泡沫稳定性起着重要作用。特别是,这种相互作用在一定的覆盖范围内是协同的。这种类型的协同作用可以为涉及注气的EOR过程提供更强大的流动性控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信