From aspect-oriented models to aspect-oriented code?: the maintenance perspective

A. Hovsepyan, R. Scandariato, S. Baelen, Y. Berbers, W. Joosen
{"title":"From aspect-oriented models to aspect-oriented code?: the maintenance perspective","authors":"A. Hovsepyan, R. Scandariato, S. Baelen, Y. Berbers, W. Joosen","doi":"10.1145/1739230.1739241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aspect-Oriented Modeling (AOM) provides support for separating concerns at the design level. Even though most AOM approaches provide means to execute the composition of the modularized concerns to obtain a composed model, it is also possible to keep the concerns modularized at the implementation level by targeting an aspect-oriented platform. Model-driven approaches have emerged to support both alternatives via tools. Clearly, these choices are not equivalent. Rather, they have a direct impact on several dimensions, including maintainability. Hence, the main research problem addressed by this work is to figure out which alternative provides for shorter maintenance time. To answer this question, we have conducted a series of quantitative studies and experiments.","PeriodicalId":353153,"journal":{"name":"Aspect-Oriented Software Development","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aspect-Oriented Software Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1739230.1739241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

Aspect-Oriented Modeling (AOM) provides support for separating concerns at the design level. Even though most AOM approaches provide means to execute the composition of the modularized concerns to obtain a composed model, it is also possible to keep the concerns modularized at the implementation level by targeting an aspect-oriented platform. Model-driven approaches have emerged to support both alternatives via tools. Clearly, these choices are not equivalent. Rather, they have a direct impact on several dimensions, including maintainability. Hence, the main research problem addressed by this work is to figure out which alternative provides for shorter maintenance time. To answer this question, we have conducted a series of quantitative studies and experiments.
从面向方面的模型到面向方面的代码?:维护角度
面向方面的建模(AOM)为在设计级别分离关注点提供了支持。尽管大多数AOM方法提供了执行模块化关注的组合以获得组合模型的方法,但是也可以通过针对面向方面的平台在实现级别保持关注的模块化。模型驱动的方法已经出现,通过工具支持这两种选择。显然,这些选择是不相等的。相反,它们对几个维度有直接影响,包括可维护性。因此,本工作的主要研究问题是找出哪种替代方案提供更短的维护时间。为了回答这个问题,我们进行了一系列的定量研究和实验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信