Information Asymmetry and the Pricing of Private Debt - Evidence from European Syndicated Loans

O. Bosch
{"title":"Information Asymmetry and the Pricing of Private Debt - Evidence from European Syndicated Loans","authors":"O. Bosch","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.963412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We analyze a sample of UK syndicated loan contracts, containing detailed firm data for both private and public borrowers for the time period 1996 through 2005 to explore the impact of information asymmetry on loan spreads. Consistent with the asset pricing literature, we find that lenders charge systematically higher spreads when the borrower lacks publicly available information. However, previous firm-lender relationships mitigate this information asymmetry and reduce the spread. Additionally, we find evidence that an increase in the loan share retained by the mandated arranger mitigates informational frictions within the lending syndicate and consequently reduces the interest spread charged to the firm. Therefore, we conclude that informational frictions between informed mandated arrangers and uninformed participant banks impose an additional syndication-specific information premium on the borrower. To the best of our knowledge, this paper is first to empirically explore whether loan spreads charged to firms are affected by the amount of publicly available firm information, prior firm-lender relationships and bank reputation. Further, the paper addresses the endogenous link between loan spreads and syndicate structure by employing actual bank loan portfolio data.","PeriodicalId":122807,"journal":{"name":"Private Debt Contracting","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Private Debt Contracting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.963412","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

We analyze a sample of UK syndicated loan contracts, containing detailed firm data for both private and public borrowers for the time period 1996 through 2005 to explore the impact of information asymmetry on loan spreads. Consistent with the asset pricing literature, we find that lenders charge systematically higher spreads when the borrower lacks publicly available information. However, previous firm-lender relationships mitigate this information asymmetry and reduce the spread. Additionally, we find evidence that an increase in the loan share retained by the mandated arranger mitigates informational frictions within the lending syndicate and consequently reduces the interest spread charged to the firm. Therefore, we conclude that informational frictions between informed mandated arrangers and uninformed participant banks impose an additional syndication-specific information premium on the borrower. To the best of our knowledge, this paper is first to empirically explore whether loan spreads charged to firms are affected by the amount of publicly available firm information, prior firm-lender relationships and bank reputation. Further, the paper addresses the endogenous link between loan spreads and syndicate structure by employing actual bank loan portfolio data.
信息不对称与私人债务定价——来自欧洲银团贷款的证据
我们分析了英国银团贷款合同样本,其中包含1996年至2005年期间私人和公共借款人的详细公司数据,以探索信息不对称对贷款息差的影响。与资产定价文献一致,我们发现,当借款人缺乏公开信息时,贷款人收取系统性更高的利差。然而,以前的公司-贷款人关系缓解了这种信息不对称,减少了利差。此外,我们发现有证据表明,授权安排人保留的贷款份额的增加减轻了贷款辛迪加内部的信息摩擦,从而减少了向公司收取的利息差。因此,我们得出结论,知情的强制性安排人和不知情的参与银行之间的信息摩擦对借款人施加了额外的银团特定信息溢价。据我们所知,本文首次实证探讨了向企业收取的贷款利差是否受到公开可获得的企业信息数量、先前的企业-贷款人关系和银行声誉的影响。此外,本文通过使用实际银行贷款组合数据来解决贷款息差与辛迪加结构之间的内生联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信