Introduction: China and North Korea: between development and security

Catherine Jones, Sarah Teitt
{"title":"Introduction: China and North Korea: between development and security","authors":"Catherine Jones, Sarah Teitt","doi":"10.4337/9781788979702.00008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, the international community, and particularly the United Nations (UN), has drawn greater attention to the tension between support and protection for the fragile population of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea or DPRK (also known as North Korea) and attempts to curtail its development of nuclear weapons, arguing that the security threats posed by the North Korean state and the insecurities confronting its citizens are inextricably linked. Up until 2014, the international community adopted separate processes and policies to address the external and internal security threats in North Korea, imposing UN sanctions to manage the external threat, and providing humanitarian aid to support a struggling population to address the internal threats. In 2014, with the publication of a UN-mandated Commission of Inquiry report into the human rights of the population in North Korea, attention was refocused on the relationship between the internal and external security environments. This re-invigorated focus raises the question of how can or should the international community, and particularly North Korea’s neighbouring states, manage or mitigate the internal security threats emanating from North Korea. Although it would be naïve to suggest this is a new question, in responding to it this book adopts a new approach. It identifies that China and the Republic of Korea (also known as South Korea) have a long history of approaching the external and internal threats as a part of the same problem, seeking to address the external threat from the regime through internal development. As such, they have both sought to support the development of the population, including their healthcare needs, food supplies and living conditions, and the national economy in North Korea, without unintentionally supporting nuclear developments. For example,","PeriodicalId":393712,"journal":{"name":"China–North Korea Relations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China–North Korea Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788979702.00008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In recent years, the international community, and particularly the United Nations (UN), has drawn greater attention to the tension between support and protection for the fragile population of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea or DPRK (also known as North Korea) and attempts to curtail its development of nuclear weapons, arguing that the security threats posed by the North Korean state and the insecurities confronting its citizens are inextricably linked. Up until 2014, the international community adopted separate processes and policies to address the external and internal security threats in North Korea, imposing UN sanctions to manage the external threat, and providing humanitarian aid to support a struggling population to address the internal threats. In 2014, with the publication of a UN-mandated Commission of Inquiry report into the human rights of the population in North Korea, attention was refocused on the relationship between the internal and external security environments. This re-invigorated focus raises the question of how can or should the international community, and particularly North Korea’s neighbouring states, manage or mitigate the internal security threats emanating from North Korea. Although it would be naïve to suggest this is a new question, in responding to it this book adopts a new approach. It identifies that China and the Republic of Korea (also known as South Korea) have a long history of approaching the external and internal threats as a part of the same problem, seeking to address the external threat from the regime through internal development. As such, they have both sought to support the development of the population, including their healthcare needs, food supplies and living conditions, and the national economy in North Korea, without unintentionally supporting nuclear developments. For example,
导读:中国与朝鲜:在发展与安全之间
近年来,国际社会,特别是联合国(UN)更加关注支持和保护朝鲜民主主义人民共和国(简称DPRK)脆弱人口与遏制其核武器发展的努力之间的紧张关系,认为朝鲜国家构成的安全威胁与其公民面临的不安全是密不可分的。直到2014年,国际社会采取了不同的程序和政策来解决朝鲜的外部和内部安全威胁,实施联合国制裁来管理外部威胁,并提供人道主义援助来支持挣扎的人民解决内部威胁。2014年,随着联合国授权的调查委员会(Commission of Inquiry)发布了一份关于朝鲜人口人权状况的报告,人们的注意力重新集中到内部和外部安全环境之间的关系上。这种重新焕发活力的关注提出了一个问题,即国际社会,特别是朝鲜的邻国,如何能够或应该管理或减轻来自朝鲜的内部安全威胁。虽然naïve暗示这是一个新问题,但在回答这个问题时,本书采用了一种新的方法。它指出,中国和大韩民国(也被称为韩国)在将外部和内部威胁视为同一问题的一部分方面有着悠久的历史,寻求通过内部发展来解决来自政权的外部威胁。因此,它们都力求支持朝鲜人民的发展,包括他们的保健需求、粮食供应和生活条件,以及国民经济,而不会无意中支持核发展。例如,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信