An Analysis of Oil & Gas Company Disclosures from the Perspective of the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures

R. Eccles, Michael P. Krzus
{"title":"An Analysis of Oil & Gas Company Disclosures from the Perspective of the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures","authors":"R. Eccles, Michael P. Krzus","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3091232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We conducted a type of “field experiment” to evaluate how difficult it will be for companies to implement the recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) published in June of 2017. These recommendations are based on the four categories of governance, strategy, risk management, and targets and metrics. Beneath these are 11 more detailed recommendations. We selected an industry that will be especially challenged by these recommendations — oil & gas. We examined the disclosures of 15 of the largest oil & gas companies by market cap that had filed a 10-K or 20-F in 2016, so before the TCFD’s recommendations were published. We also examined their sustainability reports. Our reasoning was that if companies were already doing a reasonable amount of disclosure before these recommendations were published, then it would be more feasible to implement the TCFD’s recommendations than if virtually no related disclosures were being made. In general, we found reporting for that year uneven, with some TCFD categories fairly well covered and others not. We also found variation across companies, with most making fairly modest disclosures but some being fairly progressive in this regard. Significantly, we also found that most of the disclosures were in voluntary sustainability reports, not the financial filings required by statute and as recommended by the TCFD. Taken in the aggregate, at least one company was reporting on each of the 11 recommendations with one exception. This suggests that it is feasible for companies in this sector to follow the TCFD’s recommendations if they are interested in doing so.","PeriodicalId":151913,"journal":{"name":"ChemRN: Energy Policy (Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ChemRN: Energy Policy (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3091232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

We conducted a type of “field experiment” to evaluate how difficult it will be for companies to implement the recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) published in June of 2017. These recommendations are based on the four categories of governance, strategy, risk management, and targets and metrics. Beneath these are 11 more detailed recommendations. We selected an industry that will be especially challenged by these recommendations — oil & gas. We examined the disclosures of 15 of the largest oil & gas companies by market cap that had filed a 10-K or 20-F in 2016, so before the TCFD’s recommendations were published. We also examined their sustainability reports. Our reasoning was that if companies were already doing a reasonable amount of disclosure before these recommendations were published, then it would be more feasible to implement the TCFD’s recommendations than if virtually no related disclosures were being made. In general, we found reporting for that year uneven, with some TCFD categories fairly well covered and others not. We also found variation across companies, with most making fairly modest disclosures but some being fairly progressive in this regard. Significantly, we also found that most of the disclosures were in voluntary sustainability reports, not the financial filings required by statute and as recommended by the TCFD. Taken in the aggregate, at least one company was reporting on each of the 11 recommendations with one exception. This suggests that it is feasible for companies in this sector to follow the TCFD’s recommendations if they are interested in doing so.
从气候相关财务披露工作组的角度分析石油和天然气公司的披露
我们进行了一种“实地实验”,以评估企业实施气候相关财务披露工作组(Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures, TCFD)于2017年6月发布的建议的难度。这些建议基于治理、战略、风险管理以及目标和度量这四个类别。下面是11条更详细的建议。我们选择了一个特别受这些建议挑战的行业——石油和天然气。我们研究了15家市值最大的油气公司的披露情况,这些公司在2016年提交了10-K或20-F报告,也就是在TCFD的建议发布之前。我们还研究了他们的可持续发展报告。我们的理由是,如果公司在这些建议发布之前已经进行了合理数量的披露,那么实施TCFD的建议比实际上没有进行相关披露的公司更可行。总的来说,我们发现那一年的报告不均衡,一些TCFD类别得到了很好的覆盖,而另一些则没有。我们还发现各公司之间存在差异,大多数公司披露的信息相当有限,但有些公司在这方面相当进步。值得注意的是,我们还发现,大多数披露都是在自愿的可持续发展报告中,而不是法律要求的财务文件和TCFD的建议。总的来说,除了一个例外,至少有一家公司在报告这11项建议中的每一项。这表明,如果有兴趣,该行业的公司遵循TCFD的建议是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信