Who are the Witnesses of the Covid-19 Lockdown? The Case of France

Louis Gabrysiak, S. Gensburger
{"title":"Who are the Witnesses of the Covid-19 Lockdown? The Case of France","authors":"Louis Gabrysiak, S. Gensburger","doi":"10.5117/9789048557578/ahm.2022.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the wake of the COVID lockdowns implemented all around the world, and in particular since March 2020, private and public initiatives have emerged to collect diaries, testimonies, and perspectives on the pandemic from ordinary citizens. These calls for witnesses have been presented as a way to preserve traces of the pandemic for the future and to give a voice to all kinds of people confronted with the health crisis, in order to build an \"ordinary memory\" of the event. In this paper, we will study these social practices of witnessing in a time of crisis. Who were the people who answered these callouts? Who will be considered the witnesses of this pandemic in the future What social groups do they come from in terms of level of education, income, marital status, place of residence, birthplace, ethnicity, religion, and gender? This article will ask to what extent ordinary memories of crisis can really be preserved. It argues that institutional calls for witnesses of the health crisis cannot avoid reproducing some of the social inequalities that have been central in framing ordinary people's experience of the pandemic and the lockdown.","PeriodicalId":347966,"journal":{"name":"AHM Conference 2022: ‘Witnessing, Memory, and Crisis’","volume":"122 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AHM Conference 2022: ‘Witnessing, Memory, and Crisis’","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5117/9789048557578/ahm.2022.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the wake of the COVID lockdowns implemented all around the world, and in particular since March 2020, private and public initiatives have emerged to collect diaries, testimonies, and perspectives on the pandemic from ordinary citizens. These calls for witnesses have been presented as a way to preserve traces of the pandemic for the future and to give a voice to all kinds of people confronted with the health crisis, in order to build an "ordinary memory" of the event. In this paper, we will study these social practices of witnessing in a time of crisis. Who were the people who answered these callouts? Who will be considered the witnesses of this pandemic in the future What social groups do they come from in terms of level of education, income, marital status, place of residence, birthplace, ethnicity, religion, and gender? This article will ask to what extent ordinary memories of crisis can really be preserved. It argues that institutional calls for witnesses of the health crisis cannot avoid reproducing some of the social inequalities that have been central in framing ordinary people's experience of the pandemic and the lockdown.
谁是Covid-19封锁的见证人?法国案例
在世界各地实施COVID封锁之后,特别是自2020年3月以来,出现了私人和公共倡议,以收集普通公民对大流行的日记、证词和观点。这些证人的呼吁是为了为未来保留大流行病的痕迹,并让面临健康危机的各种人发出声音,以便建立对这一事件的“普通记忆”。在本文中,我们将研究这些在危机时刻见证的社会实践。回答这些呼号的人是谁?谁将被视为未来这场大流行病的见证人,他们在教育水平、收入、婚姻状况、居住地、出生地、种族、宗教和性别方面来自哪些社会群体?本文将探讨,普通的危机记忆究竟能在多大程度上得以保存。它认为,机构要求卫生危机目击者的呼吁无法避免再现一些社会不平等现象,而这些不平等在塑造普通人对大流行和封锁的经历方面发挥了核心作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信