An Analytical Model for Axial Force Transfer and the Maximum Compression Point of Work Strings in Extend Reach Drilling

R. Shaibu
{"title":"An Analytical Model for Axial Force Transfer and the Maximum Compression Point of Work Strings in Extend Reach Drilling","authors":"R. Shaibu","doi":"10.19080/imst.2020.02.555592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Complex work string dynamics are often observed when one is investigating the limit of Extended Reach Drilling (ERD), yet the underlying physical causes of anomalous problems are often not fully understood and is thus a topic of ongoing research interest. Theoretical models capturing tubular dynamics have been previously proposed to analyze force transfer in work strings, yet there is significant confusion regarding these models because their published versions are not entirely consistent and, in many cases, do not meet engineering requirement. Further confusion is introduced through variations in pin-pointing locations where axial compression in the work strings should be checked for mechanical integrity. A simple and yet rigorous mathematical model is essential for adequate prediction of axial compression profiles in work strings for ERD. This article presents a simplified tubular mechanics model for describing axial force transfer under ERD conditions. We discuss the model in finding the point of peak compression in casing strings. This point is predicted to be in the arc section near the heel of a horizontal wellbore, under borehole drilling, and casing running conditions. The exact location of the peak axial compression changes with pipe-wall friction coefficient. For the friction coefficient in the range of 0.15 to 0.35, this point occurs in the range of inclination angle between 70.7 o and 81.5 o , averaging 76.1 o . The model can also be used for other purposes, including prediction of depth limit, bottom hole assembly (BHA) design, and locking up analysis of coiled tubing (CT) strings.","PeriodicalId":434464,"journal":{"name":"Insights in Mining Science & Technology","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insights in Mining Science & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19080/imst.2020.02.555592","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Complex work string dynamics are often observed when one is investigating the limit of Extended Reach Drilling (ERD), yet the underlying physical causes of anomalous problems are often not fully understood and is thus a topic of ongoing research interest. Theoretical models capturing tubular dynamics have been previously proposed to analyze force transfer in work strings, yet there is significant confusion regarding these models because their published versions are not entirely consistent and, in many cases, do not meet engineering requirement. Further confusion is introduced through variations in pin-pointing locations where axial compression in the work strings should be checked for mechanical integrity. A simple and yet rigorous mathematical model is essential for adequate prediction of axial compression profiles in work strings for ERD. This article presents a simplified tubular mechanics model for describing axial force transfer under ERD conditions. We discuss the model in finding the point of peak compression in casing strings. This point is predicted to be in the arc section near the heel of a horizontal wellbore, under borehole drilling, and casing running conditions. The exact location of the peak axial compression changes with pipe-wall friction coefficient. For the friction coefficient in the range of 0.15 to 0.35, this point occurs in the range of inclination angle between 70.7 o and 81.5 o , averaging 76.1 o . The model can also be used for other purposes, including prediction of depth limit, bottom hole assembly (BHA) design, and locking up analysis of coiled tubing (CT) strings.
大位移钻井工作柱轴向力传递及最大压缩点解析模型
在研究大位移钻井(ERD)的极限时,经常会观察到复杂的工作管柱动力学,但异常问题的潜在物理原因往往没有完全了解,因此是一个持续研究的主题。先前已经提出了捕捉管状流体动力学的理论模型来分析工作串中的力传递,但由于这些模型的发布版本并不完全一致,并且在许多情况下不符合工程要求,因此存在很大的困惑。由于工作管柱轴向压缩检查机械完整性的精确定位位置的变化,导致了进一步的混淆。一个简单而严谨的数学模型对于ERD工作管柱轴向压缩曲线的预测至关重要。本文提出了描述ERD条件下轴向力传递的简化管状力学模型。讨论了套管柱峰值压缩点的求解模型。在钻孔和套管下入条件下,该点预计位于水平井筒足跟附近的弧形段。轴压峰值位置随管壁摩擦系数的变化而变化。摩擦系数在0.15 ~ 0.35范围内,此点出现在倾角70.7 ~ 81.5°范围内,平均为76.1°。该模型还可用于其他用途,包括深度极限预测、底部钻具组合(BHA)设计和连续油管(CT)锁紧分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信