The Effects of Performance Incentives and Creativity Training on Creative Problem-Solving Performance

Kun Huo
{"title":"The Effects of Performance Incentives and Creativity Training on Creative Problem-Solving Performance","authors":"Kun Huo","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2644634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I investigate the effect of different incentive schemes on employees’ effort and performance in a creative problem-solving task because current literature is divided on the effect of performance-based incentives on creative problem-solving. Using an experiment, I compare two types of performance-based incentives (piece-rate pay and fixed wage plus recognition) with fixed wage alone and examine whether creativity training can moderate the relationship between incentives and creative problem-solving performance. Extending the theoretical predictions from Bonner and Sprinkle’s (2002) incentive-effort-performance model to creative tasks, I predict that the effect of performance-based incentives on creative problem-solving performance will be more positive in the presence of creativity training than in its absence. In the experiment, 120 participants attempted to solve six problems requiring creative insight under time constraints. Creative problem-solving performance is measured as the number of insight problems solved. Significant interactions with training are found for both piece-rate wage and recognition. I find that, without training, piece-rate pay produces lower performance than fixed wage. With training, however, performance is higher under piece-rate pay than under fixed wage. Relative to fixed wage alone, fixed wage plus recognition has no effect on performance without training, but recognition generates higher performance with training. Findings from this study have implications for organizations that need creative output from their employees and are looking to use incentives, either monetary or non-monetary, to motivate superior performance.","PeriodicalId":131740,"journal":{"name":"Research Papers (Concurrent Session or Poster Session if not accepted for Concurrent Session)","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Papers (Concurrent Session or Poster Session if not accepted for Concurrent Session)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2644634","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

I investigate the effect of different incentive schemes on employees’ effort and performance in a creative problem-solving task because current literature is divided on the effect of performance-based incentives on creative problem-solving. Using an experiment, I compare two types of performance-based incentives (piece-rate pay and fixed wage plus recognition) with fixed wage alone and examine whether creativity training can moderate the relationship between incentives and creative problem-solving performance. Extending the theoretical predictions from Bonner and Sprinkle’s (2002) incentive-effort-performance model to creative tasks, I predict that the effect of performance-based incentives on creative problem-solving performance will be more positive in the presence of creativity training than in its absence. In the experiment, 120 participants attempted to solve six problems requiring creative insight under time constraints. Creative problem-solving performance is measured as the number of insight problems solved. Significant interactions with training are found for both piece-rate wage and recognition. I find that, without training, piece-rate pay produces lower performance than fixed wage. With training, however, performance is higher under piece-rate pay than under fixed wage. Relative to fixed wage alone, fixed wage plus recognition has no effect on performance without training, but recognition generates higher performance with training. Findings from this study have implications for organizations that need creative output from their employees and are looking to use incentives, either monetary or non-monetary, to motivate superior performance.
绩效激励与创造力训练对创造性问题解决绩效的影响
我研究了不同的激励方案对员工在创造性问题解决任务中的努力和绩效的影响,因为目前的文献在基于绩效的激励对创造性问题解决的影响上存在分歧。通过一项实验,我将两种基于绩效的激励(计件工资和固定工资加认可)与单独的固定工资进行了比较,并检验创造力培训是否可以调节激励与创造性解决问题绩效之间的关系。将Bonner和Sprinkle(2002)的激励-努力-绩效模型的理论预测扩展到创造性任务,我预测,在有创造力训练的情况下,基于绩效的激励对创造性问题解决绩效的影响将比没有创造力训练的情况更为积极。在实验中,120名参与者试图在时间限制下解决六个需要创造性洞察力的问题。创造性解决问题的表现是通过解决洞察力问题的数量来衡量的。研究发现,计件工资和认可与培训之间存在显著的相互作用。我发现,如果没有经过培训,计件工资比固定工资产生的绩效更低。然而,在培训方面,计件工资比固定工资的表现要好。相对于单独的固定工资,固定工资加认可对不经过培训的绩效没有影响,而认可对经过培训的绩效产生更高的影响。这项研究的发现对那些需要员工创造性产出并希望使用货币或非货币激励措施来激励卓越绩效的组织具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信