Chapter 6: The Reasoning Process

S. Rubinstein
{"title":"Chapter 6: The Reasoning Process","authors":"S. Rubinstein","doi":"10.1080/10610405.2021.1899677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main element of thinking that we have singled out—analysis through synthesis that detects more and more new properties in the analyzed objects when they are incorporated into new connections—is also highly important for an understanding of the reasoning for a proof and the derivation in the course of reasoning of more and more new propositions. It contains the key to the answer to a question that has constantly come up in the history of scientific and philosophical thought: How is it possible in reasoning, for example regarding geometry, based on a finite number of premises, to arrive at an infinite number of more and more new deductions? The answer to this question lies, above all, in the fact that in the course of any reasoning process, including a deductive one—which, however, is never performed in real life separately from induction—more and more new premises are introduced that are not given in the original conditions. These new premises are formed by means of an analysis that is done through synthesis, an analysis that, by incorporating objects into more and more new connections, “scoops out” more and more new content from them, “turns them around,” as it were, to their other side, and makes them function in a new capacity, with a new conceptual character. For example, in the conditions of a problem, it is only given that a certain segment is a bisector. By correlating the segment with other segments, angles, and figures it is determined that that segment is a median, then that it is also a transversal, and so forth. Each of these premises that emerge in the process of analyzing the problem represents a new, minor premise that is introduced into the reasoning by the course of analysis. The thinking process itself creates prerequisites and conditions for its further progress. The reason that the necessary reasoning for a proof and the derivation of certain propositions from others can lead to more and more new knowledge and deductions is that this process yields more and more new data and new, “minor” premises.","PeriodicalId":308330,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Russian & East European Psychology","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Russian & East European Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10610405.2021.1899677","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The main element of thinking that we have singled out—analysis through synthesis that detects more and more new properties in the analyzed objects when they are incorporated into new connections—is also highly important for an understanding of the reasoning for a proof and the derivation in the course of reasoning of more and more new propositions. It contains the key to the answer to a question that has constantly come up in the history of scientific and philosophical thought: How is it possible in reasoning, for example regarding geometry, based on a finite number of premises, to arrive at an infinite number of more and more new deductions? The answer to this question lies, above all, in the fact that in the course of any reasoning process, including a deductive one—which, however, is never performed in real life separately from induction—more and more new premises are introduced that are not given in the original conditions. These new premises are formed by means of an analysis that is done through synthesis, an analysis that, by incorporating objects into more and more new connections, “scoops out” more and more new content from them, “turns them around,” as it were, to their other side, and makes them function in a new capacity, with a new conceptual character. For example, in the conditions of a problem, it is only given that a certain segment is a bisector. By correlating the segment with other segments, angles, and figures it is determined that that segment is a median, then that it is also a transversal, and so forth. Each of these premises that emerge in the process of analyzing the problem represents a new, minor premise that is introduced into the reasoning by the course of analysis. The thinking process itself creates prerequisites and conditions for its further progress. The reason that the necessary reasoning for a proof and the derivation of certain propositions from others can lead to more and more new knowledge and deductions is that this process yields more and more new data and new, “minor” premises.
第六章:推理过程
我们所举出的思维的主要要素,即通过综合分析,当被分析的对象被纳入新的联系时,就会发现越来越多的新性质,这对于理解在推理越来越多的新命题时的证明推理和推导推理,也是非常重要的。在科学和哲学思想史上经常出现的一个问题,即在推理中,例如在几何学的推理中,以有限数目的前提为基础,怎么可能得出无限数目的、越来越多的新演绎呢?这个问题的答案首先在于,在任何推理过程中,包括演绎推理过程在内,在现实生活中演绎推理过程是离不开归纳法的,在这个过程中,越来越多的新前提被引入,而这些前提并不是在原来的条件中给出的。这些新的前提是通过综合的分析而形成的,这种分析通过把对象纳入越来越多的新联系中,从它们“挖掘”出越来越多的新内容,仿佛把它们“转过来”,转到它们的另一边,使它们以新的能力,以新的概念性质发挥作用。例如,在一个问题的条件下,只给定某段是等分线。通过将这条线段与其他线段、角度和图形相关联,可以确定这条线段是中线,然后它也是截线,以此类推。在分析问题的过程中出现的每一个前提都代表了分析过程中引入推理的一个新的、次要的前提。思维过程本身为其进一步发展创造了前提和条件。证明的必要推理和从其他命题中推导出某些命题可以导致越来越多的新知识和演绎的原因是,这个过程产生越来越多的新数据和新的“次要”前提。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信