The unresolved mystery of the great divergence is solved

Ron W. Nielsen
{"title":"The unresolved mystery of the great divergence is solved","authors":"Ron W. Nielsen","doi":"10.1453/JEST.V3I2.777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The so-called great divergence in the income per capita is described in the Unified Growth Theory as the mind-boggling and unresolved mystery about the growth process. This mystery has now been solved: the great divergence never happened. It was created by the manipulation of data. Economic growth in various regions is at different levels of development but it follows similar, non-divergent trajectories. Unified Growth Theory is shown yet again to be incorrect and scientifically unacceptable. It promotes incorrect and even potentially dangerous concepts. The distorted presentation of data supporting the concept of the great divergence shows that economic growth is now developing along moderately-increasing trajectories but mathematical analysis of the same data and even their undistorted presentation shows that these trajectories are now increasing approximately vertically with time. So, while the distorted presentation of data used in the Unified Growth Theory suggests generally sustainable and secure economic growth, the undistorted presentation of data demonstrates that the growth is unsustainable and insecure. The concept of takeoffs from stagnation to the sustained-growth regime promoted in the Unified Growth Theory is also dangerously misleading because it suggests a sustainable and prosperous future while the mathematical analysis of data shows that the current economic growth is insecure and unsustainable.","PeriodicalId":401502,"journal":{"name":"arXiv: Economics","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv: Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1453/JEST.V3I2.777","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

The so-called great divergence in the income per capita is described in the Unified Growth Theory as the mind-boggling and unresolved mystery about the growth process. This mystery has now been solved: the great divergence never happened. It was created by the manipulation of data. Economic growth in various regions is at different levels of development but it follows similar, non-divergent trajectories. Unified Growth Theory is shown yet again to be incorrect and scientifically unacceptable. It promotes incorrect and even potentially dangerous concepts. The distorted presentation of data supporting the concept of the great divergence shows that economic growth is now developing along moderately-increasing trajectories but mathematical analysis of the same data and even their undistorted presentation shows that these trajectories are now increasing approximately vertically with time. So, while the distorted presentation of data used in the Unified Growth Theory suggests generally sustainable and secure economic growth, the undistorted presentation of data demonstrates that the growth is unsustainable and insecure. The concept of takeoffs from stagnation to the sustained-growth regime promoted in the Unified Growth Theory is also dangerously misleading because it suggests a sustainable and prosperous future while the mathematical analysis of data shows that the current economic growth is insecure and unsustainable.
大分歧的未解之谜解开了
所谓人均收入的大分化,在统一增长理论中被描述为增长过程中令人难以置信的未解之谜。这个谜现在已经解开了:大分化从未发生过。它是通过操纵数据而产生的。各区域的经济增长处于不同的发展水平,但它遵循着相似的、无分歧的轨迹。统一增长理论再次被证明是错误的,在科学上是不可接受的。它提倡不正确的甚至是潜在危险的概念。支持大分流概念的扭曲数据显示,经济增长目前正沿着适度增长的轨迹发展,但对相同数据的数学分析,甚至是对其未扭曲的呈现方式的分析,表明这些轨迹现在几乎是随时间垂直增长的。因此,虽然统一增长理论中使用的扭曲数据表示表明经济增长通常是可持续和安全的,但未扭曲的数据表示表明增长是不可持续和不安全的。统一增长理论(Unified Growth Theory)倡导的从停滞到持续增长机制的起飞概念也具有危险的误导性,因为它暗示了一个可持续和繁荣的未来,而对数据的数学分析表明,当前的经济增长是不安全且不可持续的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信