Web Question Answering: Beyond Factoids: SIGIR 2015 Workshop

Eugene Agichtein, David Carmel, C. Clarke, Praveen K. Paritosh, D. Pelleg, Idan Szpektor
{"title":"Web Question Answering: Beyond Factoids: SIGIR 2015 Workshop","authors":"Eugene Agichtein, David Carmel, C. Clarke, Praveen K. Paritosh, D. Pelleg, Idan Szpektor","doi":"10.1145/2766462.2767861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Automatic question answering is a central topic in information retrieval. Web search engines have made great progress at answering factoid queries, such as “how many people live in Australia?”. These can provide a succinct answer, up to a few words in length, and sometimes offer additional information such as related facts or entities. However, for deeper questions which could benefit from a longer response (e.g., “history of Australia”), current search engine resort to returning a link to a detailed web document. Alternatively, such a question might be posted on a Community Question Answering (CQA) site (“Visiting Australia in May, what should I see?”), hoping to get a human authored and detailed response. In this workshop we aim to explore the boundaries of Web question answering to better understand the spectrum of approaches and possible responses that are more detailed than a short fact, yet are more useful than a full document result. Is it possible to automatically answer diverse questions ranging from advice on fixing a broken sink to requests for opinions on the best basketball player of all time. In addition, questions submitted on the Web can be either short and ambiguous (such as Web queries to a search engine), or long and detailed (such as CQA questions). This workshop is particularly timely for two additional reasons: (1) there still exist many disagreements regarding the goals and nature of Web question answering services, mostly relating to the questions of “question intent” (what kind of queries benefit from question answering compared to other methods); and (2) leading search engines are eager to provide","PeriodicalId":297035,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 38th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 38th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2766462.2767861","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Automatic question answering is a central topic in information retrieval. Web search engines have made great progress at answering factoid queries, such as “how many people live in Australia?”. These can provide a succinct answer, up to a few words in length, and sometimes offer additional information such as related facts or entities. However, for deeper questions which could benefit from a longer response (e.g., “history of Australia”), current search engine resort to returning a link to a detailed web document. Alternatively, such a question might be posted on a Community Question Answering (CQA) site (“Visiting Australia in May, what should I see?”), hoping to get a human authored and detailed response. In this workshop we aim to explore the boundaries of Web question answering to better understand the spectrum of approaches and possible responses that are more detailed than a short fact, yet are more useful than a full document result. Is it possible to automatically answer diverse questions ranging from advice on fixing a broken sink to requests for opinions on the best basketball player of all time. In addition, questions submitted on the Web can be either short and ambiguous (such as Web queries to a search engine), or long and detailed (such as CQA questions). This workshop is particularly timely for two additional reasons: (1) there still exist many disagreements regarding the goals and nature of Web question answering services, mostly relating to the questions of “question intent” (what kind of queries benefit from question answering compared to other methods); and (2) leading search engines are eager to provide
网络问答:超越Factoids: SIGIR 2015研讨会
自动问答是信息检索中的一个核心问题。网络搜索引擎在回答虚假查询方面取得了巨大进步,比如“澳大利亚有多少人口?”这可以提供一个简洁的答案,最多几个字的长度,有时还提供额外的信息,如相关的事实或实体。然而,对于更深入的问题,可以从更长的回答中获益(例如,“澳大利亚的历史”),目前的搜索引擎会返回一个链接到一个详细的网络文档。或者,这样的问题可以发布在社区问题回答(CQA)网站上(“5月访问澳大利亚,我应该看到什么?”),希望得到一个人工撰写的详细回答。在本次研讨会中,我们的目标是探索Web问题回答的边界,以更好地理解各种方法和可能的回答,这些方法和回答比简短的事实更详细,但比完整的文档结果更有用。是否有可能自动回答各种各样的问题,从修理坏水槽的建议到对有史以来最好的篮球运动员的意见。此外,在Web上提交的问题可以是简短而模棱两可的(例如对搜索引擎的Web查询),也可以是冗长而详细的(例如CQA问题)。这次研讨会特别及时,还有另外两个原因:(1)关于Web问答服务的目标和性质仍然存在许多分歧,主要是关于“问题意图”的问题(与其他方法相比,什么样的查询从问答中受益);(2)领先的搜索引擎渴望提供
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信